As next year's presidential election draws near, the gap between support ratings for President Chen Shui-bian (
While the president was visiting the US and Panama, the KMT legislative caucus on Nov. 4 condemned his visit to China in 1991 when he was a legislator, questioning whether he saw any Chinese leaders, made any promises or colluded with the Chinese communists to sell out Taiwan. Some even said he should be ashamed for taking a photo with a Chinese tank at a military museum in Beijing, and that he was much inferior to the man who tried to stop a long line of tanks during the notorious 1989 Tiananmen Square Incident.
In fact, the KMT legislative caucus' campaign trick was an ignorant method that exposed its own weakness by contrasting Chen's, Lien's and Soong's personal experiences in dealing with China. Chen did visit China during his term as a legislator. During his trip, he met Tang Shubei (
Given the cross-strait political environment at that time, it was indeed a breakthrough for Chen -- a pro-Taiwan independence legislator from Taiwan's biggest opposition party -- to visit China. Not only did he let the officials for Taiwan affairs understand the nation's political development and the voice of the Taiwanese people, he also gained a better understanding of Beijing's political hegemony and its negotiation mode.
Thanks to such past experience, Chen has always made the development of cross-strait relations, national defense, military research and Taiwan's future status his main focus throughout his political career. As a result, he proposed the "four ifs," "de facto sovereignty," the referendum platform and the Resolution on Taiwan's Future one after another inside the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). This laid a foundation for his dominance of the DPP's China policy.
Besides, he advanced with the times by proposing various cross-strait policies -- such as a basic cross-strait treaty, the "five noes," the cross-strait integration dictum, the relaxation of the "no haste, be patient" policy and the policy of "active opening, effective management." He also proposed to push for a new constitution through a referendum not long ago. These proposals allow Taiwan to rationally and practically face China's threat of swallowing up the nation and building Taiwan into a new democratic and free society and country.
This shows that Chen knows Beijing much better than Lien or Soong. His valuable visit to China made him understand how to handle complicated cross-strait issues, as well as how to deal with Chinese leaders appropriately. This is where Lien and Soong are inferior to Chen. Today, the KMT has tried to attack Chen using his own campaign tactic of calling rivals "pro-China," and using his past visit to smear him. In fact, this action only further exposed their ignorant and absurd attitude. How can the Taiwanese people trust them for correctly handling cross-strait affairs?
The KMT legislative caucus' mistaken campaign strategy will not make the Taiwanese people believe that Chen was selling out Taiwan during his visit to China. On the contrary, it will make us think that this is a reflection of the Lien-Soong camp's lack of confidence -- as the Chinese saying goes, "There is no 300 taels of silver buried here" (
As a legislative assistant at that time, I was fortunate to visit China with Chen in 1991. I still remember that he wrote down "Taiwan" in the column of nationality on the customs form when entering China through the Beijing International Airport. At first, those Chinese customs officials did not know whether they should request him to correct "Taiwan" to "China" or directly prohibit his entry. But he was allowed to enter China eventually thanks to the Chinese government's courteous reception.
Chen was neither too humble nor haughty in his dealings with China. He demonstrated the determination of the Taiwanese people and maintained our dignity. Saying that Chen was selling out Taiwan during his visit to China is perhaps the biggest joke of all.
Chen Sung-shan is a member of the Cabinet's Civil Service Protection and Training Commission.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations