As the election campaign heats up, we can see the predicaments facing the blue and green camps in terms of strategy and implementation.
For the blue camp, the lack of a quick response mechanism and the poor ability to manipulate issues are merely superficial problems. Its most serious and fundamental problem is the lack of a consistent attitude and discourse on core issues. Simply put, does the blue camp have consistent and clear views on core campaign issues -- be they on the cross-strait front or the economic front? Once they hammer out these viewpoints, other problems can be readily solved. Otherwise, the blue camp will fall into a predicament in which it can only react to its opponent's moves as they come, being always passive and slow to respond.
This has already happened over three issues: the "one-country on each side" dictum, referendums and the creation of a new constitution. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was the first to present these issues. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) have always opposed the DPP's stance in a formulaic response, and then revised their positions after discovering a poorer-than-expected response from the public.
If the KMT and PFP do not have a complete set of views on these issues, then they will be unable to break out of this cycle even if they have a better rapid-response force. One concrete manifestation of this is the disparate statements often made by KMT-PFP representatives in media comments.
Though in a passive position on these issues, the KMT and PFP still have room to develop their platforms and are not necessarily at a disadvantage. For example, regarding "one country on each side," the KMT and PFP could have quickly defined it as a description of the status quo, with the People's Republic of China on one side and the Republic of China on the other. They could have claimed that there was no conflicting point between the two camps -- if there was one, that would mean that the DPP's "other side" is the Republic of Taiwan.
On the referendum issue, the KMT and PFP should have supported the spirit and conduct of referendums while stating that referendums should not obstruct economic development, that there should be complementary accountability measures and that referendums should be held after legislation.
As for creating a new constitution, they could have countered the green camp's plan by proposing constitutional amendments. They could also present a complete version of constitutional amendments to prove their sincerity and ability to carry out reforms. There is also a consistent pattern to these approaches -- seeking differences amid similarities. They must agree with their opponent's views on the general direction of localization and reforms, while using differences beneficial to themselves as a keynote in their debate. Only then will they not be painted as anti-reform; only then will they have an opportunity to pull the campaign back to economic issues.
Being in a relatively disadvantageous position, the DPP has raised many major issues to try to strike at the existing structure. On the surface, such an aggressive approach may create an appearance of leading the debate, but at the same time it also carries a relatively higher risk of making mistakes. The fact that the DPP has been able to take this approach has very much to do with the KMT-PFP camp's passive responses. For example, the DPP made a major mistake in its campaign when it used a spurious cut-and-paste approach in a TV commercial to insinuate that Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was "abandoning Taiwan and toadying up to China." But the KMT-PFP camp let go of this opportunity. Compare this to the DPP's vehement response to the PFP Legislator Kao Ming-chien (高明見) incident [in which Kao was accused of collaborating with Beijing to create an impression that China was helping Taiwan during the SARS crisis]. No wonder the D PP has so much room to make mistakes and try out different tactics one after another.
In a one-to-one campaign battle, however, it is highly questionable whether the green camp's tactic of raising ideological issues will win the election battle. After consolidating its basic voter base, the green camp must return to the middle way at a certain point. Only then can it possibly win the election. A key factor influencing this election campaign lies in whether the DPP will be able to smoothly return to the middle after moving to such extremes.
Another question is the accuracy of President Chen Shui-bian's (
At this stage of the campaign, the important point is what role it will play in the development of democracy in Taiwan, no matter whose tactics are superior and no matter which side wins. Do we have to invoke agitated, confrontational debates on national identity and the future of the Constitution during every election cycle and then spend four years after the election to heal the wounds and build consensus? Campaign strategies have been reported extensively in horse-race-style discussions, but there has been no room for proposing and debating policies. Changes in the support rates have become important points to keep track of, but no one has been concerned about exactly which issues are of immediate concern to the electorate.
As campaign emotions run high, we should pause and think about whether this election will be one for choosing a country or a constitution, or for choosing to change Taiwan's political culture.
Emile Sheng is an associate professor of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry