There was another fistfight in the Legislative Yuan Thursday, disgracing the nation's highest legislative body. The violence once again became hot news in the international media. Such uncivilized, undemocratic and irrational performances have made Taiwan's democracy regress.
No matter what the provocation, physical fights between lawmakers are unacceptable. In the past, the legitimacy of the legislative body was questionable -- the majority of the lawmakers did not represent the will of the people of Taiwan. This meant that irregular approaches were required to highlight the problem, and although resorting to physical abuse is wrong, it was excusable. Although the Taiwanese people and international media condemned the violence, they could understand the motives behind it.
But times have changed. Thursday's fight was basically an extension of the conflict between the blue and green camps. The blue camp wanted to pressure the judicial agencies regarding the National Security Bureau's secret funds in order to embarrass both President Chen Shui-bian (
The legislature should severely discipline all those involved in the fight. The public should not be left thinking that the legislature's self-discipline is inferior to that of the Taoyuan County Council, which recently suspended two councilors involved in a physical altercation.
As the next presidential election draws near, it's getting more and more difficult to maintain the calm in the legislature because lawmakers from both camps see the Legislative Yuan as the best arena for political competition. Legislative immunity has made the legislature a center for rumor-mongering as lawmakers attack their rivals with ridiculous accusations. The review of the Executive Yuan's budget for the next fiscal year has been delayed, showing that half the functions of the legislative branch have been paralyzed.
The semi-paralysis of the legislature is the greatest source of political turmoil in the nation. That is why the legislature should call a recess after passing the budget and allow lawmakers to concentrate fulltime on campaigning. The next legislative session, which is scheduled to begin in February, should be postponed until after the presidential election. Otherwise campaign pressures will lead to similar political and physical confrontations in the legislature. Nothing will be accomplished, and that would be a further insult to the public.
The people are dissatisfied with the legislature. Although the government is planning reforms, including smaller electoral districts, a single-ballot system and halving the number of seats, these measures keep being postponed because of the maneuvering of vested interests. The implementation of such reforms will be more or less impossible if we have to rely on the legislature itself to pass these measures. Another way must be found to break through this deadlock. The recent physical confrontations highlight both the deficiencies in many legislators and the need for legislative reform as soon as possible.
The government wants to hold a referendum concurrent with the presidential election in March. The question of overhauling the legislature should be included in that referendum. Since our representatives are incapable of resolving the reform issue themselves, giving the people a chance to directly voice their opinions would provide a huge boost to the reform movement.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations