Anglican unity could be shattered by the consecration of a gay American bishop that has revealed a far greater cultural divide within its ranks than the ordination of women priests ever did.
US liberals hailed Canon Gene Robinson's installation as an end to hypocrisy, but African bishops railed about the Devil taking over the church.
"I think it is going to be very messy," said Church Times editor Paul Hanley. "For the first time, in the not-too-distant future we might be having to use that word -- split."
But analysts said Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams may have won some breathing space by setting up a commission to study one of the thorniest issues in the Anglicans' 450-year history. With the sound and fury raging over Robinson's appointment, any new church leaders will be put on the spot over the burning issue that divides 70 million Anglicans.
"The questions used to be about their attitude to women priests. Now it is `what is your line on gays?' It has become a touchstone of people's orthodoxy," Hanley said.
Anglicans have never had the rigid hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church where the Pope can wield excommunication as a very real threat.
The Archbishop of Canterbury is "First Among Equals" who can offer spiritual guidance but never wave the big stick. Consensus rules -- which is both the strength and weakness of a church stretched over 164 countries.
Williams, not Robinson, is the man in the spotlight now. A bearded ascetic more versed in theological doctrine than raw passion, he has been thrust once more into the furious debate over homosexuality.
Earlier this year he saw first-hand how divisive the issue can be when he was engulfed in a row in England over Canon Jeffrey John, a celibate gay priest who had been appointed Bishop of Reading but who later stepped down.
"He has not shown himself to be that dynamic so far," said religious commentator Clifford Longley. "His total effort so far has been to march them to the top of the hill and then back down again. That does not bode well for the future."
So how do churches split from the Anglican communion and what can Williams do about it?
"If Nigeria decided to break away, it can just do so. It is autonomous. Williams has no legal powers whatsoever to stop them," Longley said.
A breakaway in the US however could provoke ugly confrontations between American liberals and conservatives.
"There could be major rows over property, investments, salaries and pensions. The lawyers would have a field day," he said.
But the yawning gaps are already there, with Longley arguing that an Episcopalian from the US would not be welcomed today in Nigeria as a fellow Anglican.
For the two sides are more than just an ocean apart. Kenya's Archbishop Benjamin Nzimbi said "The devil has clearly entered the church. God cannot be mocked."
British vicar Giles Fraser, who runs a grassroots network of Anglicans campaigning for inclusivity, said the likely outcome is a looser Anglican Communion rather than a split.
Conservative churches in the US who did not want their liberal leadership might prefer to have an African bishop, he said. This would break down the geographical structure of the church and make it more ideologically based.
Canadian bishop Michael Ingram, whose diocese became the first in Anglican history to sanction blessings for gay and lesbian couples, said both sides were fed up with duplicity.
"The former way of doing things in the church was `nudge nudge, wink wink, don't ask, don't tell,'" he said.
So the game comes round full circle to the Archbishop of Canterbury and this is where analysts really do sympathize with Williams over the insoluble equation.
"What the hell is he supposed to do?" asked Clifford Longley. "There is no magic formula. He has inherited a mess. The best score he can hope for is 0-0. There is no winner."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations