When President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) stopped over in New York to receive the 2003 International Human Rights Award, Chinese students and expatriates gathered outside the venue to stage a noisy protest. A few days ago, in Northwest University in China's Xian City, obscene acts performed by four Japanese people in a skit triggered protests by thousands of Chinese students.
What's the significance behind these two protests?
Under China's continual brainwashing with nationalist ideology, the Chinese people have long harbored illusions about threats. Any small act viewed by Chinese as disrespectful is likely to trigger immense frustration and is therefore interpreted as a threat to China's national security. When everything is weighed on the level of "security," the significance displayed by words and actions actually reflects the Chinese people's limitless anxiety about security.
Although Chinese officialdom has continuously tried to create an environment of "peace and development," what the Chinese students have done is make it more difficult for the outside world to believe that China is a peace-loving country.
Similarly, in its Taiwan policy, China has always subjectively believed that Taiwan's independence will inevitably affect its security in the Asia-Pacific region. But it has never given a thought as to how much it has threatened Taiwan by deploying 400 missiles.
Due to China's stubborn cultural understanding of security, Chen's past soft approach has failed to move the stubborn stone. Prevalence of the "China threat theory" in the international community is actually a pernicious consequence China has brought upon itself.
Even so, it is beneficial for the survival of China's regime. When people imagine that all threats posed to the country come from the outside, the Communist Party of China can certainly sit back and relax. The agitated demonstrations by Chinese students and protests against foreigners are merely an instrument manipulated by Beijing.
Wang Kun-yi is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry