In an interview with the Washington Post on Oct. 8, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said that "Taiwan is an independent, sovereign country," but "the 23 million people of Taiwan do not have a constitution that genuinely belongs to them." He also said that "as the leader of this country, I have a duty, responsibility, and a strong sense of mission" to push for a new constitution that truly fits the people of Taiwan.
Indeed, the Constitution of the Republic of China (ROC) currently implemented in Taiwan does not belong to Taiwanese people. This Constitution was formulated on the basis of China and the Chinese people. In terms of international law, the San Francisco Peace Treaty, in which Japan renounced its claim over "Formosa and the Pescadores," did not stipulate that Taiwan's sovereignty belongs to China. Since Taiwan is not part of China and since the ROC does not own Taiwan's sovereignty, the ROC Constitution certainly does not belong to Taiwanese people.
Although the ROC Constitution has been imposed on Taiwan and a prototype of Taiwanese democracy has been based on it, it was not tailor-made for Taiwan and its people. Like an adult's outfit put on a kid, it could not fit the child even after alterations. We need a new one. Now is the time for Taiwan to create a constitution to fit the needs of its 23 million people.
In addition, the creation of a constitution can prevent Taiwan from falling into China's trap. If Taiwan still holds onto the ROC Constitution, which claims that Taiwan is part of China, then this is no different from digging its own grave and jumping into the "one China" negotiation trap set up by China. This is definitely not something we want to see.
In fact, only the "one country on each side [of the Taiwan Strait]" platform fits in with Taiwan's optimum benefits in cross-strait negotiations. In his recently published book entitled Ten Sentences that Influenced Taiwan (十句話影響台灣), Examination Yuan President Yao Chia-wen (姚嘉文) quoted a declassified telegraph from 1971 which revealed that vice foreign minister Yang Hsi-kun (楊西崑) and ambassador to the US George Yeh (葉公超) told then president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) that the Taiwan government should completely separate itself from, and severe its links with, the People's Republic of China (PRC) government so that Taiwan will not be annexed by the PRC.
Obviously, only by separating itself from China will Taiwan gain its optimum benefits. The ROC Constitution established on the basis of "one China" should have been scrapped long ago.
KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) has previously served as foreign minister, premier and vice president, but rather than emulating the wise people of the past, he has acted against his conscience to proclaim that Taiwan is part of the ROC's territory and that Taiwan should amend, rather than rewrite, its constitution so that he can snatch the presidency. He has audaciously attempted to force Taiwan into a disadvantageous position in cross-strait relations, sacrificing the benefits to which the people of Taiwan and Taiwanese businesspeople in China are entitled.
Through integration following the two world wars, Taiwanese people have transformed into what former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) called "the new Taiwanese people." A "contract" ought to be signed between them to show their identity with this land. This contract will be Taiwan's new constitution. No matter what content will be stipulated in the constitution, it will be jointly decided by the 23 million people, rather than being forced onto us by 1.2 billion Chinese people. It will be a "new contract" for the "new Taiwanese people."
In addition to reforming the government's structure, this new contract will also declare that Taiwan is not part of China, Taiwan enjoys independent sovereignty and self-determination, and Taiwan is an independent nation. Therefore, the foremost goal of creating a constitution is to build a nation. This will be the only way to meet the needs of Taiwanese people and pursue optimum benefits.
Let us pool our efforts to support President Chen's bid to push for a new constitution and achieve the great cause of building Taiwan as a nation.
David Huang is commissioner of the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission at the Examination Yuan.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs