Open letter to Chen Ding-nan
I write to express my concern regarding the case of Su Chien-ho (
More specifically, I am earnestly hoping that the prosecution will truthfully and professionally fulfill their duty of presenting the state's case to the court.
The truth, as you also know, is that during five full trials over a span of 12 years, not a single piece of physical evidence has ever been introduced in this case that can possibly connect any one of the accused to any part of the crime, still less without reasonable doubt.
I want to emphasize at this point, though of course you know this as well, that every one of the three accused must be found guilty separately, that is, there must be different pieces of evidence that link each of them to the crime.
No such evidence has ever been presented. And so many years after both the events and the investigation, any claims of "finding" new evidence must be treated with the utmost skepticism. It would also probably require an administrative or even criminal investigation of all people involved in the process.
There is only one honest way for the prosecution to proceed. They need to enter the court on Oct. 27, and clarify, item by item, that the prosecution is in fact unable to establish the evidentiary value of any physical evidence in the case.
Some items which have been associated with one or the other of the accused cannot be shown to have any link to the crime. These included common household items lacking any indication that they were used for unusual purposes, and which in any case were improperly acquired -- even in those days police were required to have search warrants.
The rest, including everything found at the scene as well as the victims' bodies themselves, cannot be demonstrated to have even an indirect link to any of the three accused.
After the prosecutors complete their analysis, the only thing left to consider will be the five "confessions." The prosecutors must then inform the judges that all five statements were provided in circumstances which do not meet current procedural standards of criminal prosecution, and point out that, in each case when a confession was brought into the light of proper procedure, it was promptly and completely retracted.
They should also add the fact that the only material witness, the only person who apparently had physical evidence connecting him to the crime, and who was thus the key to the entire case, will not be available to testify because the state already executed him in 1992.
This is the only ethical course of action for prosecutors in this case. Any attempt to defend the probative value of the so-called "evidence" would simply perpetuate a chain of abuse of the truth, and all prosecutors who get involved in such behavior will have forfeited their professional responsibility to uphold the law and seek genuine justice.
Of course, none of the steps described above would diminish the discretion of the judges. They could still find any or even all of the three men guilty. This is their power.
But let them bear the responsibility alone; at least your consciences would be clear.
Bo Tedards
Taipei
Why fear foreigners?
It has been a long time since I have read something in your newspaper as appalling as the xenophobic drivel in the opinion piece by Chen Tian-jy (陳添枝) calling for a tax on men marrying foreign brides ("Slap a `wife tax' on the wayward Taiwanese," Oct. 17, page 8).
Chen worries that: "Because it is difficult for foreign brides to work, they can be full-time mothers and give birth to relatively larger numbers of children. Our future generations will be the offspring of foreigners. This has worried many people."
I would like to remind Chen that from the point of view of Taiwan's Aboriginal people, this country is already populated mainly by the descendants of foreigners.
First they came from Fujian, and later from Northern China. Now the process continues, and it is nothing to be worried about.
In fact, it is a good thing. Some of the most advanced, freest and most dynamic countries in the world are multiethnic, multicultural societies.
Wang Shuxian
Taipei
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs