Former president Lee Teng-hui (
Why has the time arrived? First, Lee believes that Beijing will not dare challenge the US' military might at present. Second, since Beijing is the host of the 2008 Olympics, it will not cause any mischief before that time.
The first hypothesis is based on the judgment that the US has strengthened its unilateralism after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But it is still unknown whether US foreign policy will change after the US presidential election next year.
The second hypothesis assumes that Chinese leaders and people attach more importance to the Olympic Games than the Taiwan issue. This hypothesis also requires more analysis. Of course, Chinese nationalists will refute such a claim.
To what extent are the Olympics actually related to China's economic interests and international image? What is the relationship between these problems and China's future development strategies? A more thorough analysis is required before a conclusion can be reached.
Also seeing the Olympics in Beijing as a watershed, Japanese academic Kenichi Ohmae offers a different view on Taiwan-China relations. He says that the best opportunity to unify under a federal system will be some time prior to the Olympics.
In addition to the trend of China-centered economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region, Ohmae's argument also takes into consideration the thesis that former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (
One Olympics, but there are two interpretations.
These interpretations involve not only objective factual analyses, but also incorporate the values and strategies of these "prophets." Since Lee hopes to lead the people of Taiwan toward independence, he certainly focuses on the question of what time would be the most advantageous to do so.
Ohmae has long advocated cross-national economic integration in the hope of easing a standoff between sovereign states and increasing economic interaction between regions. He not only advocates that Taiwan and China establish a federation but also encourages Japan to actively interact with the
members of this federation. From a short- to medium-term point of view, the year 2008 indeed offers a good opportunity.
Whose prediction is correct? This involves changes in real-life situations and the ability of the players to implement what they advocate. A more interesting question is: Will the world be at peace after 2008? If Taiwan declares independence and Bei-jing does not use force before the Olympics, Taiwan still has to face the pressure Beijing applies at international occasions and the possibility that China might launch a war after the Olympics.
If unification occurs within the next two or three years, how should the various political, economic and social systems of Taiwan and China be combined? Won't such interaction lead to still greater conflict?
Policy implementation must not be halted because of concern about difficulties that may result. Advocates must make more rational statements about the processes involved. They should also foresee problems they might encounter in succeeding stages after attaining the initial goal, and come up with methods for dealing with any problems. Only then can they persuade people to join forces and implement their plans.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.