Don't believe it
I want to commend you on last Friday's excellent editorial, ("Don't believe everything you read," Oct. 10, page 8) which takes on the dissembling that followed President Chen Shui-bian's (
You particularly pointed out one very good example of how the Post's Beijing correspondent, John Pomfret, misrepresented Chen's words. With a bit more detail, this would benefit the reader more completely.
The paragraph from your editorial says: "Nowhere in the Post article, however, is a quote from Chen about `refusing to succumb to US pressure.' Instead it was Pomfret who made the observation, `Chen said he would not bow to US pressure,' after quoting Chen as saying, when asked about US pressure regarding his recent moves (ie, rewriting the Constitution and national referendums) was, `Any kind of democratic reform is our own affair. I don't think any democratic country can oppose democratic ideals.'"
One thing I would add to that would be a lesson in how to spot this sort of media spin. Instead of quoting Chen directly, Pomfret interprets Chen's supposedly intended meaning, without ever providing the "quote" from which he derived this interpretation. Anytime this happens -- you might have added -- it is a pretty good indication that the reader should pay more attention. They should read the article, as you have done for them this time, and find these discrepancies for themselves. It is a favorite tactic of unscrupulous "journalists" the world over. But don't just "give [the readers] a fish." Instead, teach them "how to fish."
Another thing you pointed out was the problem of language translation. You informed us that the title of the article, "Chen dismisses fears in US of rising tension," had the word "dismiss" translated as "contemptuously repel" (
It is especially in this kind of case where readers on either side of the language barrier need the professional assistance that can be provided by the Taipei Times and other media when they decide to be honest.
I think that in the interest of truthfulness, you should provide daily a list of contacts (for example, the names, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses) of media watchdog groups where readers/viewers/listeners can report any such discrepancies they find in media reports.
The saying "Don't believe anything you hear, and only half of what you see" is often attributed to Will Rogers or Mark Twain. But I wouldn't necessarily trust either attribution!
Andrew Hokanson
Taichung
Stand up for Taiwan
Regarding the situation with Liberia: Can the Taiwanese change their traditional "face saving" strategy?
Whenever something bad happens to Taiwan, what you will say is all so predictable and childish. Things like "We have all the information under control" or "Let it go, it is not worth it."
To some degree, I understand your feelings under the circumstance.
But more and more, I notice that Taiwan has started to give up its manhood and "cocoon" itself. You need to learn more from South Korea -- behave like a nation of bravado and courage in sports, in sciences and in politics.
If you refuse to mature, no one respect you as a "nation."
Ming Zhang
Chicago
Taiwan's jacket should fit
Wang Chien-chuang's article ("Absurd arguments should only be ignored," Oct. 16, page 8) is paradoxical itself.
The title suggests ignoring absurd statements, but the text elaborates three "absurdities." Are these "absurdities" or "truths" in Wang's mind?
It is immaterial when, where, how and by whom the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution was promulgated and enacted.
The important thing is that it was not designed specifically for Taiwan and does not fit even after amendments. The ROC Constitution applied to Taiwan is as cumbersome as a king-size men's jacket put on a little girl. What the girl needs is a jacket of the right size, a good design and proper material.
If a "Mr Wang" claims to be a "Mr King," he is most likely to be refused entry into a foreign country.
For the same reason, the UN has repeatedly refused to admit the ROC.
It's time to try the country's real name -- Taiwan -- instead. Taiwan should keep trying, even though China is a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry