Anyone who believes French President Jacques Chirac has given up his campaign against what he fears will become American domination of the planet should think again.
The French leader has appeared isolated in recent weeks as Washington left him out of kiss-and-make-up sessions with other opponents of the Iraq war, such as German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
And Chirac has chosen to avoid another all-out clash in the UN Security Council by promising that France will not use its veto to block US proposals on rebuilding Iraq.
But events since the war have convinced Chirac that he was right to stand up to the US and that France's hand has been strengthened for any future tussles, analysts say.
"The whole episode has been bruising, but not isolating. In fact, France has been proved right," said Francois Heisbourg, head of the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research.
While it is careful not to gloat, France feels vindicated by a failure to find the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq whose alleged existence provided the main argument for war.
It also correctly predicted the US could win the war alone but would need others to secure the peace.
"Multilateralism has been strengthened because the undoubted superpower has been proven incapable of managing events post-war in a country of 26 million inhabitants," said Pascale Boniface of France's Institute of Strategic and International Relations.
Shift in rhetoric?
France was back in action at the UN last week, telling Washington its latest draft resolution on Iraq did not fully answer its call for a rapid handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis and for the UN to oversee a gradual transfer of power.
In rare defiance of the Bush administration, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan lined up with France in criticizing the draft while Russia, Germany and China all expressed doubts.
This time, Chirac hopes Bush will agree US interests are best served in Iraq by working within the UN.
But France has no guarantee that the US will not go it alone again -- for example, over other countries Bush has called "axis of evil" states like Iran or North Korea.
Analysts say Chirac is shifting his rhetoric to use language less antagonistic to Washington and more likely to unite EU partners split into two camps over the Iraq war.
In his speech to the UN General Assembly last month, Chirac avoided any mention of his earlier calls for a "multipolar world" in which the US would be just one of several "poles" of power and influence in the world.
"He's realized it goes down very badly, both among the Brits and other European partners," said Charles Grant of London's Center for European Reform, noting it smacks of anti-Americanism despite Chirac's vehement assurances to the contrary.
By dropping talk of a multipolar world, it is argued, Chirac is making it easier for France and other EU partners to boost common defense efforts without raising suspicions that the EU wants to set up in competition with Washington.
That strategy may already be working. Diplomats say even Britain has now agreed that the EU should have a military planning structure separate from NATO.
No one believes the EU can rival the US as a military power any time soon. But Grant said if Washington took the EU seriously as a military force, Chirac's dream of an equal partnership across the Atlantic might come closer to reality.
"Then Europe would be sufficiently influential so that the US would have to take its views into account when making decisions," he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under