Inter-party negotiations at the Legislative Yuan reached a consensus to make amendments to the Tobacco and Liquor Tax Law (菸酒稅法) to raise the health tax levied on cigarettes from NT$5 to NT$8 per pack.
Neither NT$5 nor NT$8 is big money, yet a 60 percent rise is quite startling. Those who advocate heavy taxes on cigarettes, however, may still not be satisfied about the increase. They stress again and again that cigarette prices in Taiwan are among the lowest in the world and it is necessary to control quantity via pricing, thus cutting down tobacco consumption in Taiwan. Such a stance is echoed by people in medical circles, who see smoking as a leading cause of cancer and blame heavy smokers for wasting medical resources. The current deficit in the national health insurance (NHI) system also seems to provide some legitimate grounds for the anti-smoking movement, as a government official revealed that the increased revenue from the tax on cigarettes would be used to help fund the NHI system.
These arguments sound quite familiar. However, if we treat the health tax levied on cigarettes as a way of reducing the government's financial burden, then the good moral image of the health tax would be completely lost and the 60 percent increase in the tax could be seen as looting by the government.
A majority of tobacco consumers come from the working class. Increasing the tax on cigarettes will not help promote fairness and justice in our financial system. Instead, it will make it more unfair. Laborers are not high-income earners and have no way to dodge their tax duties. And now they have to shoulder another tax imposed on them indirectly.
Besides, the concept of controlling quantity via pricing does not apply to consumer behavior in tobacco products. The need for tobacco products endures, and few consumers would reduce their consumption of cigarettes because of higher prices. The same behavior can be found in betel-nut consumption, which continues to see great demand despite a sky-rocketing prices. Therefore, raising the health tax levied on cigarettes simply entitles the government to enjoy extra income in the name of preserving the public's health.
It is worthwhile noting that from ethical, medical and NHI perspectives, the best way to control consumption is through price. They all mistakenly individualize the issue of tobacco consumption rather than treat it as a social issue. The smoking habits of the working class have a lot to do with their working conditions and life style.
Strictly speaking, if we really want to curb smoking or cut down the use of medical resources, we should first deal with the cruel structural reality that Taiwanese work more hours every year than anyone else in the world. The mainstream anti-smoking ethic ignores this fact and worships the control of quantity via pricing. As a result, tobacco consumers often fall victim to criticism and the NHI is being treated like a commodity. For example, in an attempt to control quantity via pricing, the NHI has raised premiums, forcing the main users of the service, namely the elderly, handicapped and laborers, to pay more for their medical needs.
The cigarette issue exemplifies Taiwan's mainstream discourse, which worships the market economy in controlling quantity via pricing, making Taiwan's social security system tilt to the right. This, of course, also reveals that fact that the health tax is healthy only in name, as it badly distributes wealth in a form of a regressive tax [ie, the poorer you are, the more tax you pay]. Under such circumstances, the 60 percent tax hike would continue the class inequality in Taiwan's wealth distribution.
Wu Ting-feng is a PhD candidate in sociology at Tunghai University.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry