In the months leading to the March 20 presidential election, contending political leaders have intensified the already highly acrimonious partisan wrangling and mudslinging that have allowed for little progress on issues of substantive benefit for the overall security and well being of the Tai-wanese in the last few years. While these leaders maneuver for short-term gain in the domestic political arena, the cross-strait balance of power and the overall international balance of influence affecting the nation's future ominously and unrelentingly moves against democratic Taiwan.
China has markedly advanced its already advantageous position in international affairs since the 1970s, when the PRC replaced the Republic of China on Taiwan (ROC) in the UN, scores of countries switched recognition from Taipei to Beijing, and the US cut its diplomatic, defense and other official ties with Taiwan for the sake of normalizing relations with China.
Beijing is more determined than ever to isolate Taiwan from official international interchange as part of a broader effort to press Taiwan's government to come to terms on unification in ways acceptable to China.
An important opportunity for Taiwan came with the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union -- developments that seemed to end the main reason why the US and some other Western powers felt impelled to cut back ties with Taiwan for the sake of improving relations with China in seeking a broader united front against the USSR.
The concurrent Tiananmen crackdown shocked the US and much of the rest of the world, prompting sanctions and pressures on Beijing from various quarters. Taiwan's moves toward greater democracy after the ending of martial law in 1987 also received widespread praise and positive media attention. Arguably Taiwan should have been able to make substantial diplomatic and foreign policy gains in this new international environment, but its showing was poor as the reality saw few countries willing to confront China over the "Taiwan issue."
China's economic prowess grew markedly in the 1990s; the China market now far outshines Taiwan's struggling economy; if international actors are forced to choose, they generally choose to side with Beijing. Even many businesspeople in Taiwan have come to similar judgments, assessing that their interests are best served by cooperation with the rapidly growing Chinese economy.
Economic strength has fed military strength, while the end of the USSR meant that Beijing could focus more on coastal threats and especially the danger of Taiwan moving toward independence -- an anathema to Beijing that appeared increasingly likely under the leadership of former president Lee Teng-hui (李光耀) and President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
The result is an increasingly rapid buildup of military forces designed to improve Chinese power projection capabilities to coerce Taiwan. US President George W. Bush's administration was more supportive of Taiwan than the previous US administration -- representing one of the few bright spots on Taipei's foreign horizon.
Prevailing conditions, notably US power and purpose, sustain a balance in the Taiwan Strait and in East Asia that for now preserves stability and buys some time for Taiwan. Perhaps because they take US support for granted, Tai-wanese leaders of various political camps have seemed less attentive to solidifying relations with the Bush administration, the US government most supportive of Tai-wan in over 30 years. They have focused instead on domestic political maneuvers, cross-strait relations and foreign affairs that have included criticisms of US policies and behavior, and actions in cross-strait relations and trade relations that have complicated US interests and Taipei's relations with the US.
Such an approach might appear acceptable if Taiwan had the power and influence to sustain an independent posture in the face of the unrelenting power and influence of China, but a sober assessment of its steadily diminishing standing in world affairs would appear to provide Taipei over the longer term with little choice other than to consolidate relations with the US or to choose accommodation with Beijing.
The arguments against the former course are many. Most notably it would: force Taiwan's leaders to curb rhetoric and actions seen in the US as disturbing cross-strait stability sought by US leaders, press Taiwanese authorities to take more substantive actions including increased military spending to support defense efforts sought by Washington to complement increased US defense efforts to deter China from attacking Taiwan and push Taiwan's leaders to deal more forthrightly with US complaints over trade issues.
Taiwan also has no assurance that a future US government might not reverse course in cross-strait relations, as has happened in the past.
It is precisely with that outcome in mind that Taiwan's leaders should be taking steps now to consolidate ties with a friendly US administration rather than continually irritate US leaders with political, military and other moves that may provoke a positive response in domestic politics but work against long-term US-Taiwan relations.
Taiwan's leaders should have some assurance that once they improve their relationship with the Bush administration and set precedents of closer US-Taiwan relations, these precedents will prove hard to reverse. In particular, the US Congress, media and interest groups that have long been friendly to Taiwan can be expected to resist a reversal in relations.
Congress and these other groups have a hard time under the division of powers in the US Constitution to initiate steps forward in US relations with Taiwan, but Congress is much better positioned to block a reversal of existing relations.
Robert Sutter is a professor of Asian studies in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under