On Oct. 3, the Straits Times of Singapore reported that China plans to stage a large-scale military exercise codenamed "Swift East Sea 03" along the coast of Fujian Province around Taiwan's Double Ten Day. Around 100,000 troops will participate in the exercise, the report said.
One can't help feeling surprised by the assertion, which came after so many reports saying that Beijing would stay calm and low-key in order to avoid inadvertently helping the Democratic Progressive Party in next year's election.
Some pro-unification media in Taiwan were euphoric after hearing the report. After failing to confirm the report with the Ministry of National Defense and the US government, however, they took the trouble to explain how the Chinese military exercise will be different from previous ones. They even invited some "China experts" to explain how Beijing has no choice but to hold war games because of its unhappiness with the Taiwan-independence movement.
It is unclear what effect another military exercise will have on the pro-independence movement after so many of China's verbal and military threats have failed. For this reason, far fewer Taiwanese media groups are dancing to the news this time. However, because the Straits Times is a serious newspaper and because the report sounded plausible, it is still worth analyzing, whether the information is true or not. But one should look at what unusual political developments in Beijing have led sources to leak this information.
The Chinese Communist Party is holding the third plenary session of its Central Standing Committee on Oct. 11, about the same time as the reported date of the military exercise. This makes one wonder whether the exercise is aimed at Taiwan or at that meeting in Beijing. This meeting is by no means a simple affair.
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) initially wanted to speak on party reforms at the party's anniversary celebrations on July 1, but he was stopped by former president Jiang Zemin (江澤民), now chairman of the Central Military Commission. As a result, Hu could only give an empty talk about Jiang's "Three Represents."
Hu and Premier Wen Jiabao (
The Xinhua News Agency, however, reported that after a meeting of the party's Politburo on Sept. 29, Hu presided over the eighth collective learning session of the Politburo and discussed political reforms. A few days before that, the Outlook Weekly, another CCP mouthpiece, had published an article by a professor from the Central Party School, who was one of Hu's advisors. The article said the Politburo will answer to the Central Standing Committee and accept its supervision in the future.
This clearly indicates that Hu is emulating the late Soviet president Nikita Kruschev: he is using a majority in the party's central committee to deal with the conservative-dominated Politburo. It looks like there had been some kind of incident that allowed Hu to get even with Jiang. Perhaps he found a weak spot in the corruption of Jiang's Shanghai gang.
Hu was scheduled to attend the UN General Assembly in New York last month. The trip was allegedly canceled because of objections from Jiang, but Hu probably did not dare travel because of the power struggles.
What's even more surprising was that Jiang did not show up at China's National Day banquet on Sept. 30, which all nine Central Standing Committee members of the Politburo attended. The next day, ie, National Day, Jiang showed up, surrounded by bodyguards, in Tiananmen Square. He also greeted tourists to highlight his existence.
The state-run media, however, did not report his appearance. This seems to indicate that his appearance had not been approved by the party center. This is a rare incident in the party's history.
Is the disclosure of a planned military exercise an attempt by Jiang to put pressure on Hu? Jiang can accuse Hu of leaning to the right for keeping cool about Taiwan's upcoming presidential election. Once, the military is mobilized, however, there could always be a major unexpected incident.
The development of the situation in China deserves the utmost attention.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry