Following a rash of criticism against Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Was the merger done properly? Did it involve any economic crimes? It is too early to accuse any party of any impropriety. The Taipei City Government, however, needs to clarify a few points regarding conflicts of interest.
The city's Department of Finance said on Sunday that the bank merged with FFH, not its affiliate Fubon Bank, and that the merger was based on net value, not assets. However, that explanation still leaves several points unanswered.
First, as Liao has pointed out,TaipeiBank's assets are much larger than those of FFH. Before the merger, the Fubon group had expanded its assets by restructuring to bring its affiliates under the FFH umbrella. This, however, does not change the fact that a small company acquired a larger one, no matter what the process is called. The city government's explanations about net value do not entirely refute the arguments made on the basis of asset value.
Second, how did TaipeiBank chief executive officer Jesse Ding (丁予康) become a FFH board member? He is the key character in this affair -- a matchmaker who became the groom. Before the deal, Ding was a member of TaipeiBank's executive board -- representing the city government -- while also moonlighting as the bank's chief executive officer. He was one of the key negotiators for the merger. After the merger, he was appointed to FFH's board by the Fubon group's largest shareholders , the Tsai family -- but on his own, not as a representative of the city government. The city government raised no objections to Ding joining the FFH board, despite the obvious conflict of interest.
Taipei City councilors, however, have raised questions about the dramatic hike in Ding's salary -- from between NT$4 million and NT$5 million when the bank was still a state-owned enterprise, to NT$20 million (including dividends) now. It is difficult not to associate such an increase with Ding's role in the merger.
Third, how appropriate was the timing of the city's planned sale of the FFH shares it gained in the share swap? The city announced the merger in August last year. Some business analysts say the synergy effect of a merger does not become apparent until three years afterwards. Why is the city in a hurry to sell the shares after only one year?
Finally, is the share sale the only way to resolve the city's financial difficulties? The city government can use its shares as collateral for loans, which, given the present low interest rates, appear a better deal. But the city is pushing ahead with plans to get rid of the shares by evaluation instead of open bidding. -- no wonder even Ma's own party -- the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) -- is complaining.
The merger has been touted as a success, but that does not mean it does not warrant further scrutiny. Either Ma was misinformed from the very beginning, or he has knowingly condoned actions by subordinates that are aimed at benefitting a business conglomerate. Both scenarios are detrimental to Ma's political career.
Sunday's press conference left more questions than it answered. If the city government cannot clarify the details of the merger, the Control Yuan should launch an investigation.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under