Taiwan seems to be very democratic these days. Decrees and regulations concerned with democracy are almost complete, and shortcomings are made up for by referendums.
In reality, however, Taiwan can at best claim to be democratic in form, not in spirit. So what does this mean? It means that the political culture, especially the culture of decision-making is usually undemocratic and is often anti-democratic.
Compared to former presidents Chiang Ching-kuo (
But such is the reality.
Each time Chen raises his voice, whether it is about one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait, referendums, changing the official name of the country or the creation of a new Constitution, his comrades in the Presidential Office, the Cabinet, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or the Legislative Yuan all react in the same way
At first, they're startled, not understanding what he means or his motives, they stutter and don't know what to say when discussing the matter among themselves. But in the blink of an eye these lost comrades indeed seem to be the closest of confidantes, with one offering one explanation, another offering a heap of theoretical proof and a third busily clarifying and cooling things down.
Chen's predecessors were dictators, no two ways about it. But, frankly speaking, what is the difference between the one-man decisions of Chen and those of his predecessors?
Even more unexpectedly, that huge supporting government apparatus -- the Presidential Office, the Cabinet, the party -- does nothing without Chen's say-so. Once he utters a word, though, it moves immediately, with its full power. Chen is not the emperor and his words are not imperial decrees, but everyone in the party follows his lead. They believe whatever he says and act as if his words were law. Although the imperial decree is no more, Chen's words still have the effect of an emperor's words.
The bureaucracy in imperial China included a censor. It was not a very high position. A censor followed the emperor, and his only duty was to criticize the emperor's words and behavior. He could tell the emperor what prime ministers and other high ministers dared not say.
The DPP doesn't have a censor, nor is there one in the Cabinet. Although minority factions within the party sometimes try to fill this function, they don't have the president's ear. No matter how loudly they speak, they will at best be considered noise.
Most of the people close to Chen are plotters, they plot and do not criticize -- or they may be plotting while following orders. In the end, all this plotting turns all politics -- including elections -- into one huge conspiracy.
So how can Taiwanese politics avoid becoming a mess and become democratic?
The president, of course, doesn't have to ask the opinions of others every time he opens his mouth. But his sensational statement about the creation of a new Taiwanese Constitution is huge. The number of people who knew of this statement prior to Chen's making it can be counted on the fingers of one hand.
Maybe Chen wanted to create a theatrical effect by taking the opposition by surprise. Such effects may be needed in art. In politics, too many theatrical effects only prove a shortage of democracy. Restraint is to be recommended.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under