Cabinet Spokesman Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) debated [the referendum issue], while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) took over the leadership of the New Tide (新潮流) faction. These two originally unrelated events had something in common: both Lin and Tuan are "fifth graders" (五年級) who were born in the 50s of the ROC year count (1961 to 1970), and belong to the student movement generation.
The DPP is led by the baby boom generation (1946 to 1964) today, but those from the student movement generation are almost everywhere. Their active participation can be seen from the Presidential Office, the Executive Yuan, the ruling party, and the Legislative Yuan to local governments and councils. They are undoubtedly both the DPP's and Taiwan's heirs.
But looking back at the blue camp, most party leaders belong to the pre-baby boom generation, and most opposition legislators and councilors belong to the baby boom generation. Only a few of them are about the same age as Lin, 39, Tuan, 40, or DPP Legislator and Department of Youth Development Director Lo Wen-chia (羅文嘉), 37, and they play insignificant roles in the power relations.
Politics is considered a business of people. Political parties compete with one another in both the quality and quantity of talent. Ever since the DPP came to power, it has made many mistakes due to a lack of administrative talent. But those from the student movement generation who have already distinguished themselves will certainly become the DPP's future administrative assets.
Even if the blue camp resumes power next year, it's imaginable that those who were born before and during the baby boom generation will still take control of the government. Thus, it's impossible for "fifth graders" (aged between 33 and 42 at present) to come forward. They can only take over higher posts after their seniors step down one after another according to the feudal tradition of seniority.
The opposition camp has not had many posts to cultivate young talent over the past few years. But it failed to cultivate young talent even during the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) rule in the past. More ironically, the KMT always vows to cultivate young talent after losing an election, but it's all talk and no show. Take Taipei County, for example: the DPP has been at the helm for nearly 16 years. However, the KMT has never cultivated any young talent for the commissioner's seat in these years. Obviously, cultivating young talent is merely empty talk.
It's impossible for an aged party to transform itself into a youthful one by pretending to be young, or decorating a few young faces in its power structure. The only way is a power handover. Older politicians have to cede their power to younger ones. The handover should not be carried out step by step -- a complete change is necessary. It can be called a handover only when the pre-baby boom generation completely steps down, while a mixed leadership is formed by the baby boom generation and the student movement generation.
The KMT's efforts to make the party younger are in fact more than 10 years late compared to those of the DPP. The decade-long gap is so large that the blue camp can hardly catch up. Its future potential cannot compare with that of the DPP. If the blue camp's "old revolutionaries" are still in charge after next year's presidential election -- whether it wins back power or not -- the blue camp will not only become a political alliance that has no future, but also be destined to become passe.
Wang Chien-chuang is the president of the Journalist magazine.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations