The Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference concluded in Cancun, Mexico, on Sept. 14. Participants from 146 member states were unable to reach any agreement on agricultural issues and the "Singapore issues."
The conduct of the meeting was different from that of the previous ones. In past meetings, all related decision-making was under the control of the US, the EU and other rich industrial nations, which did not care about the views of other countries at all. They also tried to continue with the same decision-making model at this meeting, but suffered a major setback and failed to reach an agreement. This was because of the unprecedented unity of poor, developing countries. Especially worth noting was the 21-nation group formed under the leadership of Brazil, China and India.
It was the first time a Taiwan-ese delegation attended a WTO ministerial meeting since the country's accession. The ministerial meeting failed, but how did Taiwan fare in its strategic maneu-vers in the global trade body?
The first important strategy of our delegation was to stress that Taiwan is providing financial assistance to developing nations. Minister of Economic Affairs Lin Yi-fu (林義夫) seized the occasion of a ministerial statement to announce that Taiwan would donate US$250,000 to the Global Trust Fund this year, following a US$300,000 donation last year in response to calls from ministers in Doha. Lin also said Taiwan would soon provide preferential treatment to underdeveloped coun-tries and that more than 98 percent of imports from those countries will be exempted from tariffs at that time.
Even more noteworthy was that agricultural ministers from nine countries -- Taiwan, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Iceland, Israel, Bulgaria and Lichstenstien -- formed a "G9" group and presented a joint proposal. The G9 position on agricultural negotiations primarily advocates gradual liberalization, opposition to the cancelation of export and domestic subsidies, and opposition to restrictions on over-quota tariff levels and the expansion of tariff quotas. Agricultural issues took center stage at this ministerial meeting.
Even though agricultural production does not account for a large proportion of Taiwan's GNP, the past contribution of farmers to the country's economic development cannot be ignored. Farmers need to be taken care of. More-over, greater value should be attached to the preservation of the traditional paddy farming culture.
Taiwan is strongly opposing the expansion of tariff quotas and the restrictions on over-quota tariffs. It also hopes that the agricultural negotiations should consider the multiple functions of agriculture and adopt gradual liberalization. The fact that Taiwan was able to cooperate with other countries and set up a group at the WTO to protect national interests deserves special kudos.
On the other hand, Taiwan joined the WTO as a "developed" country. Therefore, our position at the meeting should be compatible with this status. It should also take care of Taiwan's political and economic relations with Western industrial nations. At the Cancun talks, Taiwan was of the opinion that the new round of talks should include investment, competitive policies, transparency in government procurements, and trade facilitation -- these four issues are collectively called the "Singapore issues" -- and that these should be negotiated simultaneously, not separately. Because these four issues are related to the improvement of the nation's trade environment, Taiwan gave all-out support to their inclusion in the new round of talks. The EU and Japan also supported the inclusion.
The setback at the ministerial meeting reveals a deep disagreement between developed nations and developing ones regarding the results of the recent trade liberalization. The US and rich countries believe free trade has already created employment and wealth throughout the world, and that reducing more trade barriers will increase the current results.
Poor countries, meanwhile, believe that the global trade rules are seriously tilting toward major industrialized nations, causing some of the world's most vulnerable people to sink deeper into poverty. They also presented statistics to blame rich nations, which spend US$300 billion every year to subsidize their agricultural sec-tors. The EU subsidizes per head of cattle US$2.5 per day, while half of the world's human population live on less than US$2 a day.
The gap between developed nations and developing ones can-not be narrowed soon. Conflicts and confrontations between the two sides are expected to con-tinue. Taiwan opted to support developed nations in Cancun. This will be conducive to the country's development as well as its economic and trade interactions with developed nations. Most of our diplomatic allies, however, are developing countries. How to respond to their demands in the future without losing the current position?
After tasting victory for the first time, developing nations are gaining a better understanding of the importance of alliance-building. "No agreement was better than a bad agreement," said the Jamaican representative.
Non-governmental organizations such as Oxfam spent time educating poor countries how to fight for their interests at the WTO conference hall. In such an environment, the US and European countries could move toward bilateral or regional free-trade treaties and use them to influence the direction of the WTO's multilateral trade negotiations. Such a development is conducive to the free-trade treaties Taiwan is working to sign with various countries.
The economic, trade and diplomatic performance this time was excellent, but we cannot become self-satisfied, given Taiwan's international status. Based on the experience gained from this meeting, the government should interact more with academic research institutions, and properly plan the strategy and direction for Taiwan's participation in the WTO. What position, for example, should we take between the industrialized nations and developing countries in order to to seek optimum benefit for Taiwan?
Teng Chung-chian is a visiting scholar at the Sigur Center for Asian Studies at George Washington University. He is a professor at National Chengchi University's department of diplomacy.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry