The violence that struck the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and United Airlines Flight 93 two years ago was an attack on Americans' freedom, but it also delivered a powerful blow to the world's hopes for peace.
Innocent citizens of 87 countries were killed in the attacks of Sept. 11 -- more than 3,000 men and women of every continent, culture, creed, race and religion. Citizens of countries from Antigua to Zimbabwe, including predominantly Muslim countries from Bangladesh to Yemen, died two years ago. Seven Taiwanese lost their lives on that dreadful day.
Mothers were snatched from their daughters, and fathers from their sons. Couples were ripped apart, friends forever separated. New York lost part of its famous skyline, but not its great spirit.
As tragic and horrific as the attacks were to my fellow citizens, they changed more than America -- they changed the world. The attacks' real impact lies beyond the pain suffered by survivors and victims' families; beyond even the threat to the security of the US. The attacks of Sept.11 made us aware that terror threatens us all.
Earlier this week, US President George W. Bush reminded all of us of the stakes in fighting terrorism. "The triumph of democracy and tolerance in Iraq, in Afghanistan and beyond would be a grave setback for international terrorism. The terrorists thrive on the support of tyrants and the resentments of oppressed peoples. When tyrants fall, and resentment gives way to hope, men and women in every culture reject the ideologies of terror, and turn to the pursuits of peace. Everywhere that freedom takes hold, terror will retreat."
Since we are all potential victims of the ideology of hatred, and because terrorists believe all lives are expendable in their drive for chaos, my nation and yours must continue to condemn the murder of innocents and reject the hatred that feeds this violence. As Secretary of State Colin Powell noted last week: "In recent months, terrorist attacks have made far too many headlines, in far too many places. In a resort in Bali. In a bus full of children in Jerusalem. In a Bombay marketplace. At the UN headquarters in Baghdad. In front of a sacred mosque in Najaf, Iraq."
Bush and Powell have built a worldwide coalition for the war against terrorism. Bush has met with leaders from more than 90 countries to build support for and coordinate the war on terrorism. More than 170 nations have contributed to this effort by arresting terrorists, freezing their assets, and providing military forces.
Worldwide efforts have lead to the capture or death of 65 percent of senior al-Qaeda leaders, operational managers, and key facilitators. Counterterrorism activities have splintered the group's leadership, so its ability to plan and carry out attacks has been compromised.
Taiwan has more than done its part in responding to terrorism, and the US deeply appreciates it. Taiwan has done what other coalition partners have done: it has strengthened its border controls and increased monitoring the flow of money to prevent it falling into terrorist hands.
Many Middle East and North African nations have arrested al-Qaeda members. European nations have contributed forces to Operation Enduring Freedom, disrupted al-Qaeda cells and are vigorously pursuing other terrorist leads. Southeast Asian countries have arrested terrorist leaders. Al-Qaeda is not destroyed, but it is wounded and we are unrelenting.
With the support of many nations, we have also pursued the war on terror in Iraq. America and allied forces removed a regime that built and used weapons of mass destruction, sponsored terror and persecuted its people.
Catastrophic weapons will no longer be in the hands of a ruthless dictator. Middle Eastern countries no longer fear subversion and attack by former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. Iraq will no longer be a source of funding for suicide bombers in the Middle East. The torture chambers in Iraq are closed, the prison cells for children are empty. We see new mass demonstrations, rather than new mass graves.
Our work in Iraq goes on, and our efforts to internationalize the renewal of that country continue in the face of difficulty. The remnants of Saddam's regime are dangerous, and terrorists are gathering in Iraq to undermine reconstruction. Al-Qaeda and the other global terror networks recognize that a democratic Iraq in the heart of the Middle East would be a grave defeat for their ideology of terror.
Unfortunately, the more progress we make in Iraq, the more desperate the terrorists will become. But we will prevail -- in Iraq, and wherever the battle must be taken. The world has learned some important lessons. In the words of Powell, "[T]he President set us on the task not just to get the killers of 9/ll, but to instead lead a global campaign against all terrorism, against all terrorists. He did this because he understood that terrorism is not just America's problem; it is everyone's problem, it is a problem for the civilized world...."
As Bush told America nearly two years ago, terrorism will be defeated. But for this to happen, it will take a strong US and our freedom-loving neighbors around the world.
"Freedom and fear are at war," he told the US Congress. "The advance of human freedom -- the great achievement of our time, and the great hope of every time -- now depends on us. Our nation -- this generation -- will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future. We will rally the world to this cause by our efforts, by our courage. We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail."
Douglas Paal is the director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs