IN 1962 the saintly Pope John XXIII signed a confidential document that outlined a policy of "strictest" secrecy in dealing with allegations of sexual abuse by priests and threatened those who spoke out with excommunication. It was dispatched to bishops all over the world.
This document has recently come to light and has been hailed by lawyers acting for the victims of abuse as a blueprint for an official Vatican policy of deception and concealment. A spokesman for the Catholic church has denied this, claiming that the lawyers have distorted the document, which deals only with the church's internal disciplinary procedures, by quoting it out of context.
This misses the point. One of the most chilling aspects of this latest revelation is that it has caused barely a ripple of surprise, even among Catholics. Sadly, this is what we have come to expect from an institution which has consistently involved bishops, priests and laity alike in a network of denial and deceit ever since 1870, when by dint of coercion and political chicanery, Pius IX got the first Vatican council to promulgate the highly controversial doctrine of papal infallibility.
Once the authority of the pope was exalted above the priesthood of all believers, it became impossible to admit that the church had ever been wrong. The sex-abuse scandal is only one instance of this determined flight from truth, justice and compassion. We have also seen it in the church's relations with the Jewish people. Pius X encouraged the Catholic press to denounce Jews as the eternal enemies of the Church. When Pius XI tried to back away from this anti-Semitic policy towards the end of his life, Vatican officials who expected his imminent death blocked his encyclical. The cardinals subsequently elected Pius XII, whose apparent failure to condemn the Nazis has become a notorious scandal.
To this day, Catholic officials find it well nigh impossible to admit that Pius XII was in any way at fault. When the Second Vatican Council tried to address the Jewish question in the 1960s, the more conservative bishops refused to pass a document that referred explicitly to any Catholic persecution of Jews in the past. The present pope, John Paul II, has issued an apology to the Jewish people that has widely been dismissed as anodyne, and he still supports the proposed canonization of Pius XII.
Once an institution declares that it enjoys unique divine guidance, it becomes constitutionally unable to admit culpability. Cover-up has become automatic.
The same process of cumulative denial is also evident in sexual matters. In the past, the church had no fixed teaching on contraception, and until the 13th century it was possible for priests to marry. But Paul VI's views were so inflexible that he could not accept the findings of his own commission on birth control, and flew in the face of science, biblical scholarship and the poignant experience of married people. His encyclical Humanae Vitae (1968) split the church, with the hierarchy upholding the ban and the laity virtually ignoring it. Many Catholics have felt spiritually impaired by the struggle to be loyal to Rome while disregarding its solemn dictates in the most intimate part of their lives.
Still more disturbing has been the present Pope's refusal to change the laws on clerical celibacy, even though it appears that some 40 percent of the clergy simply do not keep their vows. The greatest casualties of this disastrous policy have been the victims of those priests who have been unable to remain celibate and have resorted to compulsive pederasty and abuse. The suffering of thousands of children and women, who have also been abused and abandoned by priests, goes unacknowledged by a church that seems more concerned with its own image than with the demands of truth and charity.
Idolatry is not simply the worship of a false god; it occurs whenever a purely human value becomes the chief focus of religious aspiration. In its concern to shore up their authority, Catholic officials are often guilty of institutional idolatry. But they are not alone. It is becoming increasingly unusual to hear any religious leaders frankly admit the failings of their own co-religionists and institutions.
The hierarchy of the Church of England, which has recently withdrawn from the election of a homosexual bishop, seem currently in denial of the fact that, whether they like it or not, many of their priests are gay. Too many Muslim clerics are wary of issuing an outright condemnation of suicide bombing, even though it violates cardinal principles of Islam. Again, it is rare to hear a prominent rabbi condemning Israeli policies that clearly flout the golden rule propounded by the great Rabbi Hillel: "Do not do unto others as you would not have done unto you."
Religious leaders are basically politicians, and secular politicians also seem to find it impossible to apologize or admit error. The Hutton inquiry in London into the death of the British government scientist David Kelly is revealing yet another web of half-truth and evasion of responsibility. Some relatives of the Lockerbie victims have refused the compensation offered by Libya, because they do not believe that the whole story has yet come to light.
Cover-up seems to be a prevailing sin in the political arena at present, and it is perhaps unreasonable to expect rabbis, imams or bishops to be any different.
But religious politicians are committed to ideals that fly in the face of this idolatry. Many of the founders of the great world faiths were iconoclasts, who vehemently denounced the establishment of their day. The prophets subjected the kings of Israel to ruthless criticism and forced their people to face up to their own shortcomings. The same is true of the Buddha or the Prophet Mohammed. Jesus is depicted in the Gospels as a rebel, who refused to submit to laws and institutions that got in the way of charity, truth and the alleviation of suffering. It is not difficult to imagine what he would say about the abuse of children by his priests and the Vatican's persistent avoidance of responsibility for their pain.
The religions are all committed to the quest for truth, however uncomfortable. In very different ways, they also insist upon repentance, atonement and the conversion of life. They speak above all of the practice of compassion, which in every single one of the major world faiths is the litmus test of any true spirituality or ideology. It is only when a religion has become debased that it speaks of loyalty to the institution as a supreme value.
Carl Jung, I believe, once said that a great deal of religious practice seemed designed precisely to prevent people from having a truly religious experience. All idolatry is a retreat from God. There is unanimous agreement that the religious quest cannot begin until we see things as they really are. We cannot function effectively while trapped in enervating structures of denial, and a church that ignores the suffering of those it has injured in order to shore up its own authority has lost its way.
There can be no healing for either the church or its victims unless the hierarchy learns once again to speak the truth that sets us free.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry