In response to the Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) administration's economic policies, the pan-blue camp is once again using the late president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) to attack the present with the past.
At a seminar on Taiwan's economic development under Chiang, attendees, including KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and former vice premier Hsu Li-teh (徐立德), contrasted the financial policies and economic development of Chiang's rule with those of Chen's. They highlighted problems facing the administration such as enormous budget deficits, high unemployment rates, the growing gap between the rich and the poor and rough planning on public investment.
Statistics quoted by these "Chiang School graduates" showed that the economy under Chiang performed better than in recent years. Those who fondly remember Chiang's time seem to believe that economic development is a process composed of pieces irrelevant to one another. To them, even the state of the global economy is a secondary factor. Most interesting of all, when they tried to delineate the stages of Taiwan's economic development, they divided it by political leaders' terms of office.
Textbooks say the important stages in Taiwan's post-war economic development were land reform, import and export substitution, liberalization and internationalization. Liberalization and internalization started in the 1980s during Chiang's term.
At that time, Taiwan had a trade surplus with the US, China started to open its market and the triangular relationship between China, the US and Russia was changing. Following Chiang's death, the Cold War ended and the global economy was reshaped, thus speeding up the process of globalization. These continuous developments cannot be simply divided by certain people's terms of office.
It is embarrassing for the KMT to talk about the economic achievements under former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). After all, shouldn't former premier Hau Pei-tsun (
There is certainly a standard we can employ to scrutinize the Chen administration's financial policies and the corruption in the Lee era. Yet we cannot measure their performance based on development during the Chiang era. The "10 Major Construction Projects" in the 1970s did not face the problems of land acquisition that similar projects have today. The drastic measures Chiang adopted to end a run on the Taipei Tenth Credit Cooperative in 1985 are simply unavailable to Chen.
Besides, was Chiang all that efficient? Nine months before his death, during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting in early April 1987, Chiang announced the tax on slaughter houses would be abolished. He said that he had wanted to do it since he was Gan County commissioner in Jiangxi Province. He proposed the same plan when he was premier but it did not pass because of local financing constraints. So he was more than happy that 40 years later his dream finally came true.
The story was once presented as Chiang being understanding and compassionate about the people's plight. But shockingly, abolishing a tax that was not of much use earned a place in the agenda of the ruling party's central standing committee. In addition, despite knowing it was a bad tax, Chiang was not able to change it for more than 40 years.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY JENNIE SHIH
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations