In response to the Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) administration's economic policies, the pan-blue camp is once again using the late president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) to attack the present with the past.
At a seminar on Taiwan's economic development under Chiang, attendees, including KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and former vice premier Hsu Li-teh (徐立德), contrasted the financial policies and economic development of Chiang's rule with those of Chen's. They highlighted problems facing the administration such as enormous budget deficits, high unemployment rates, the growing gap between the rich and the poor and rough planning on public investment.
Statistics quoted by these "Chiang School graduates" showed that the economy under Chiang performed better than in recent years. Those who fondly remember Chiang's time seem to believe that economic development is a process composed of pieces irrelevant to one another. To them, even the state of the global economy is a secondary factor. Most interesting of all, when they tried to delineate the stages of Taiwan's economic development, they divided it by political leaders' terms of office.
Textbooks say the important stages in Taiwan's post-war economic development were land reform, import and export substitution, liberalization and internationalization. Liberalization and internalization started in the 1980s during Chiang's term.
At that time, Taiwan had a trade surplus with the US, China started to open its market and the triangular relationship between China, the US and Russia was changing. Following Chiang's death, the Cold War ended and the global economy was reshaped, thus speeding up the process of globalization. These continuous developments cannot be simply divided by certain people's terms of office.
It is embarrassing for the KMT to talk about the economic achievements under former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). After all, shouldn't former premier Hau Pei-tsun (
There is certainly a standard we can employ to scrutinize the Chen administration's financial policies and the corruption in the Lee era. Yet we cannot measure their performance based on development during the Chiang era. The "10 Major Construction Projects" in the 1970s did not face the problems of land acquisition that similar projects have today. The drastic measures Chiang adopted to end a run on the Taipei Tenth Credit Cooperative in 1985 are simply unavailable to Chen.
Besides, was Chiang all that efficient? Nine months before his death, during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting in early April 1987, Chiang announced the tax on slaughter houses would be abolished. He said that he had wanted to do it since he was Gan County commissioner in Jiangxi Province. He proposed the same plan when he was premier but it did not pass because of local financing constraints. So he was more than happy that 40 years later his dream finally came true.
The story was once presented as Chiang being understanding and compassionate about the people's plight. But shockingly, abolishing a tax that was not of much use earned a place in the agenda of the ruling party's central standing committee. In addition, despite knowing it was a bad tax, Chiang was not able to change it for more than 40 years.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY JENNIE SHIH
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry