US not a good model
Would someone care to explain Taiwan's unshakeable admiration of all things American?
Last week, we had Arthur Li's bizarre suggestion that Taiwan should be voluntarily occupied by the US (Letters, Aug. 15, page 8). His history is incorrect, incidentally -- the US did play a significant role in liberating the Far East from Japanese occupation and gave money to the KMT after 1946; Chinese troops did much of the fighting and Taiwan was unequivocally returned to Chinese rule (that is, to the KMT government) at the end of World War II. The US cannot claim sovereignty.
Then on Monday, we had Chen Ming-chung's fawning praise of American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal and his blind faith in American-style democracy (Letter, Aug.18, page 8). A few pages back from Chen, we get a glimpse of why the US really needs Taiwan: like many small, threatened nations, it can be easily pressured into buying weapons, one of the main props of the US economy ("Pan-blue criticize special budget," Aug. 18, page 4).
We learn that the US is "offering" to sell Taiwan outdated and barely-functional Patriot missiles, along with some submarines which would serve nicely as cannon-fodder in the event of a Chinese invasion (the Chinese navy fleet outnumbers Taiwan's by a factor of about 50). As well as making a pleasant new bulge in US coffers, the payments for this equipment would crush Taiwan's recovering economy just enough to keep export prices low without causing complete devastation. A win-win situation, some might say.
Taiwan needs to face two uncomfortable facts. First, that there is no defense against invasion from China except dialogue and negotiation. Taiwan is a very small country. An attack from China with ballistic or short-range missiles could destroy it completely in a matter of hours. However, it's unlikely that China would do such a thing: Taiwan's advantage is its economy, not its location, so an invasion would be via a massive ground attack. In either case, missiles, aircraft and ships would simply prolong the inevitable.
Taiwan is actually following the completely sensible route of universal conscription, ensuring that a landing army meets enormous resistance. The government would do well to enhance this system following the Swiss model, instead of buying high-tech junk from the US.
Second, Taiwan must defend itself against the US. Many countries -- not just Taiwan -- owe the US a debt of gratitude for its assistance during and after World War II. That debt has been paid many times over. Taiwan especially should never forget that during the past half-century the US laid waste to half of Asia with chemical, biological and nuclear weapons with no justification except political paranoia.
Li's ugly assertion that "conflict between the US and China is inevitable" may be true, but a war of that magnitude would probably be the greatest tragedy in human history, and Taiwan should not choose to be part of that.
The US has achieved many great things. She has also committed great atrocities (I wonder, for instance, how many Taiwanese people know the recent history of Nicaragua) and achieves her economic power not by enlightened management but by exploitation, price-fixing, political manipulation and indiscriminate arms-dealing.
For those Taiwanese who have never been there, but have heard stories of this far-off land of plenty: if you aspire to a life of obesity, a two-hour commute to work, 155 channels of cable TV and a president who talks like Homer Simpson, then the US is for you. I don't believe Taiwan should try to be like the US.
Taiwan has a great deal to be proud of and many things she could achieve. She has no need to bow and scrape to the great powers for inclusion in their cliques and clubs. Despite the noise from China, Taiwan is free to develop along her own path, with her own ideas, values and sense of pride.
Taiwan is, in fact, in a unique position: as an outsider to the UN, she may, if she chooses, become a model of peace and true democracy in a world where those concepts have been distorted beyond recognition.
Most of all, I hope she chooses the path that leads to Formosa, not Bikini Atoll.
Tony Weir
Taipei
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under