For my father's 70th birthday, I gave him a crossword puzzle. This summer, the 10th anniversary of his death at age 77, has me thinking about that puzzle again. It took a week of nonstop work to construct it. And it took a bit of nerve.
Imagine Irving Berlin's daughter writing him a song. But my dad had taught me well, and I knew that he would be proud to see that I had fit a good 20 percent of the words into the theme, that I had had to resort to only two instances of crosswordese and that my diagram did not have more than 38 black squares.
And how could he not be pleased by the definition of Nos. 1 and 2 Across: "World's best dad." The answers were six and seven letters respectively: Eugene Maleska, of course, who was the New York Times crossword-puzzle editor from 1977 until he died on Aug. 3, 1993.
I was, in a sense, merely carrying on a family tradition. All his life, my father quite literally sent cryptic messages. He met my mother when they were freshmen at Montclair State Teachers College and wooed her with one of his first puzzles. The definition for No. 1 Across was "Most beautiful girl on campus."
When my brother and I were at camp, he sent us cryptograms. Christmas gifts came with long, clever tags -- riddles in rhyming couplets that often overshadowed the gifts. And for my wedding, he wrote a 100-line poem, a kind of blessing in doggerel, chronicling the new relationship with memorable lines like: "Nathan asked,`May I toast you with espresso?'/She blushed and said,`Well, I guess so.'/He talked of British naval history,/Which to her had been a total mystery./She thought, This man is erudite;/I wonder if he's Mr. Right."
He was an irrepressible gamester. My parents actually spent a good part of their honeymoon playing Scrabble. (Mercifully, my mother was a Latin scholar and an English teacher, so she thought this was fun, too.) Anagrams were almost an obsession. Helplessly, he would manipulate every sesquipedalian word he encountered until he had wrung all possible combinations out of it.
On any long car trip, he would invariably pipe up, "Anyone for Scribble?" (A word game much like Jotto.) It is a challenge for most people to mentally hold onto five- or six-letter words when they play this game -- and even then, only if the order of the letters in the guessed words matches that of the targeted word. My parents could play with seven- and eight-letter words, jumbled in random letter order.
My father might take 10 minutes to make a guess. That's a long boring stretch for a 12-year-old in the back seat keeping score. But I realize now he was systematically flipping through whole mental dictionaries, categorized by word length, vowel placement and so forth, before venturing his response.
His wordplay went well beyond structured games. Silly rhymes and word gags seemed to pop out of him before even he knew what he was going to say.
The way our family remembered the order of the two Cape Cod Canal bridges was, I imagine, unique: "First you're Bourne, and then you Sagamore."
He once suggested that my brother handle a bully by puffing up his chest and announcing, "If you come near me, I'll expectorate in your countenance."
And one of his real coups occurred while playing Jeopardy. He pulled a card and read with a completely straight face, "Louisiana waterway named after the inventor of the sewing machine." My mother, a seamstress, went right for it: "Howe's Bayou!" "Fine." My father could hardly contain himself. "How's by you?"
It's hard to say how he got like this. He grew up in the 1920s, the only child of immigrant parents in a Jersey City row-house neighborhood. His mother was a pious Catholic housewife; his father, a prizefighter and train conductor. It's such an unlikely beginning for a crossword puzzle editor that I'm tempted to think he was just doomed from the start by something as trivial as the alliteration of his parents' names: Nellie Kelly from County Cork and Matthew Michael McCluskey Maleska.
More likely it's because his eight years of Latin study gave him great respect for the logic of language. And his parents, if not educated, were both bright and played frequent word games with him throughout his childhood.
His father was a true eccentric, an unabashed word experimenter in his own right. Once when my brother broke his wrist, Grandpa went around for days repeating: "Break an arm, break a leg, break a brack, brack a lack ... Brack a lack!" For the rest of his life, he signed all family letters, "Love, Brack-a-Lack." So there was obviously a screwy word gene in there somewhere.
My father began puzzling in his teens, on his long commute from Jersey City to Regis High School in Manhattan. Puzzles were a chance to fill in the vacuum nature abhors, he would always explain.
By the time I was born, puzzling was simply part of his daily life. He would work a full day as a New York City school principal and eventually superintendent, and then come home to his worn swivel chair and spend the next few hours dropping pipe ashes over a slew of dictionaries spread out at his feet as he scribbled on a clipboard.
It was fun, but not all fun to him. At heart he was an educator. He always said that puzzles were a painless way for people to learn.
When we were in elementary school, he dubbed a street near our home "Vocabulary Road." Every time we took it, he had to teach my brother and me a new word. That is probably why I was the only sixth grader who knew the meaning of "vituperative" or that the root of the word "phlegmatic" was the ancient Greek humor, "phlegm."
As we were running errands recently, my sixth-grade son asked from the back seat, "Why do they call it `decapitate'?" He was reading a manual for a computer game. What a chance! "Caput means`head' in Latin," I explained.
He added immediately, living up to his Mr Dictionary school nickname: "And de means to take away. I get it." I couldn't stop there. "Why do you think the name for a leader is `captain'?"
As we talked, I realized something important had just happened. Dad was still at it. One Vocabulary Road had led to another, and there was no end in sight.
Merryl Maleska Wilbur is a writer and textbook editor who lives on the North Shore of Boston.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this