For years the government has struggled and floundered with bureaucratic and poorly managed state-run enterprises, most of which are in the red year after year. President Chen Shui-bian (
Indeed, the success in turning around some of the state-run enterprises deserves some applause. For decades, state-run enterprises lacked the flexibility, innovation and profit motive of private companies. Their operations were also tightly restricted by law. Their employees, almost civil servants, received annual bonuses regardless of whether their firms were profitable or not, and often appeared unmotivated.
In view of the worldwide recession, the fact that all eight remaining state-run enterprises under the supervision of the Ministry of Finance turned a profit last year is proof of the government's determination and commitment to overhauling these firms despite the extremely painful and long restructuring process.
For example, in 1991 China Shipbuilding lost about NT$3.62 billion, with its net loss more than twice that of the previous year. By last year, however, the company had a net profit of NT$350 million. This result came at a hefty price. As many as 47 percent of its employees were laid off, while those who stayed had to take a 35 percent pay cut. Tang End Iron Works, which earned NT$400 million last year had to downsize its construction division and sell off some other non-profitable divisions.
The finance ministry had planned to complete the privatization of state-run enterprises by releasing the government's shares in these companies for public trading by the end of this year. At present only China Shipbuilding and Taiwan Salt Industrial Corp are set to complete their privatizations on schedule. The privatization of the others will be delayed. Chen has reiterated his determination that the entire privatization process will become more public and transparent in order to avoid the controversies that surrounded First Financial Holding Co's sale of new shares in the form of global depositary receipts to overseas investors.
Chen has three messages about the revamping of state-run enterprises that he wants to get across to the public. First, despite the criticism of those with vested interests and skepticism about the less-than-ideal progress reports on his administration, Chen is trying to indicate that rewards await those with patience and commitment to reforms. Second, his talk about privatization and the market mechanism aligns with a major theme of his reelection campaign, which is reform and democracy. Third, he is trying give the public a sense of hope and confidence toward both him and the future of this country under his leadership.
This is obviously done in response to the pan-blue's campaign strategy, which is to depict a general sense of dissatisfaction, pessimism and hopelessness about the present state of affairs and the future of the nation under the DPP's rule. Which will work? Only time will tell.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry