The pan-purple alliance formed by social activist groups have pointed out that the DPP and the KMT are of the same ilk and give no thought to fairness and justice or to helping disadvantaged groups. This undoubtedly is a serious blow to the DPP, whose momentum has been ebbing since the pan-blue camp's Lien-Soong ticket became a reality.
If the DPP continues to adopt the election strategy of "policy vote-buying" and the traditional methods of bringing local factions into its fold, and yet is unable to propose persuasive, implementable concepts to boost the morale of its supporters, then the party's defeat in Hualien could repeat itself in Taipei.
According to a public opinion survey conducted early last month, 40 percent of the public are satisfied with President Chen Shui-bian's (
Questioning the public about the various factors affecting Chen's performance, we find that 77 percent believe the sluggish global economy has had a big impact on Chen's government. Seventy-three percent believe Chen's government does not have enough people with a talent for governance. Sixty-five percent believe the administration does not have the ability to carry out policies. Sixty-four percent believe the opposition parties have obstructed the administration's work.
As for the question of whether TV and the newspapers have been friendly to the Chen government, 39 percent believe the media has been unfriendly. This figure is three percentage points higher than those who believe the media has been friendly.
The results show that the public has been quite fair. On the one hand, they have pointed out that the government does not have enough talented people or the ability to carry out policies. On the other hand, they also believe that the government has been affected by the global economic downturn and the opposition's obstructionism.
Even 62 percent of KMT and PFP supporters believe the opposition has obstructed the DPP government's work.
That said, people are still dissatisfied with Chen's government. For example, a third of the people who believe the opposition's obstructionism has had a great impact on government are also dissatisfied with the government. Fifty-one percent of those who believe the global economy has had a great impact are also dissatisfied with the government's performance.
In other words, even though the public "understands" that the administration's performance has been affected by the global economy and opposition obstructionism, they are still dissatisfied or disappointed with the DPP government's performance.
Not having enough talented people and the ability to carry out policies can be viewed as the DPP's internal factors, while the global economy and opposition obstructionism can be viewed as external factors. According to the analysis, the internal factors have a far greater effect on the satisfaction rates than the external factors do.
In other words, the belief that the global economy or opposition obstructionism has had an affect does have an impact on the satisfaction rate, but the impact is not so big.
In contrast, the belief that the DPP government is short on talented people and ability has a huge effect on the administration's reputation. As I have mentioned above, a majority of the public do not have enough confidence in the administration's talents and ability. Only 14 percent believe the administration has enough talented people while 73 percent believe it does not. Only a quarter of the public believe it has the ability to carry out policies while more than two thirds believe it does not.
The ability to carry out policies has the biggest impact on the administration's reputation. Improving this ability should be the key priority to attempt to reverse the public's perception of the authorities. The social activist groups are mostly disappointed with the fact that the DPP government has lost its ideals and considers everything from an election perspective.
It is very likely that the DPP will be unable to guard its 40 percent basic support if its leaders merely make election promises, cut ribbons, give away "divine pigs" and conduct an ineffectual review of the election defeat in Hualien, in the same way as the KMT reviewed its election losses in the past.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a professor of sociology at National Taiwan University and a member of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Francis Huang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations