Recently, a fourth-generation descendant of Chiang Kai-shek (
Of course, political motivations are behind such a laughable media phenomenon. Facing the "one country on each side" dictum advocated by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the KMT and the PFP know very well that the Taiwanese public have rejected their "one China" policy. Short of a counter-strategy, the blue camp has no choice but to raise the divine image of Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) to resist the DPP's offensive. Now, coincidentally, the Chiang family has a newborn child. Why not put a spin on Chiang Ching-kuo's grandchild and blur the unification-independence issue so that the blue camp won't have to clarify their stance.
The people of Taiwan must not allow themselves to be cheated. The unification-independence issue involves the lives and welfare of our future generations. Naturally, it will be one of the core issues in next year's presidential election. The KMT-PFP candidates must not be allowed to fudge their answers on such an important question. They should, with a responsible attitude toward Taiwan's electorate, clarify the difference between their "one China" or "one country" policy and Beijing's "one country, two systems" policy. They need to persuade people that their cross-strait policies are more in the interests of the majority than are the DPP's policies -- instead of trying to lead the public into a blind nostalgia for the greatness of Chiang Ching-kuo.
PFP Chairman James Soong (
We suggest that the KMT-PFP candidates give serious thought to Chen's "one country on each side" platform and come up with a smarter alternative, instead of holding on to the "one China" policy and using the myths of historical figures to blur the core issues of the presidential election. The hype over Chiang's grandson is basically an attempt to cheat the Taiwanese electorate. The blue camp should spell out its cross-strait policy and clarify what exactly is meant by a "one-China roof." They should also bring out their policy blue-print for improving the economy so that voters may compare it with the DPP's. Instead of indulging in a war of words, they should allow the people of Taiwan to make the most rational choice in next year's election.
The unemployment rate is now over 5 percent and the economy has been slow to recover. Under such circumstances, the KMT-PFP camp does have a good chance to win political power. Even so, what the Taiwanese electorate needs is an election oriented toward policies for the country's future development, not an election bogged down in vicious mud-slinging or wild campaign promises. The electorate indeed has the responsibility to monitor the campaign and make the March election a standard for newly arising democracies around the world.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with