Elections are always followed by a great variety of commentaries by people picking and choosing from the election to expound their ideas on something unrelated. The Hualien County commissioner by-election is no exception. For example, there are those making much of former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "silence," saying that it is due to the even support for the four biggest ethnic groups in Hualien, that there would be no market for Taiwan independence, and that both the blue and green camps therefore are treating Lee as a pariah.
Even though such talk isn't entirely groundless, it misses the historical aspect. Claiming that independence has a market only where ethnic Taiwanese are in majority, or that Taiwan independence is a matter of chauvinism, is really too much of an exaggeration. In fact, blue-camp candidate Hsieh Shen-shan's (
Hualien and Taitung have always been weak electoral districts for the DPP. Add to this the DPP's late decision on its candidate and reports that the party was trying to enroll a deserter from the KMT. You therefore took up his task at a difficult time, and would only have had a chance of winning had the opposition been evenly split. However, to show the sincerity of the pan-blue alliance and joint KMT-PFP ticket in next year's presidential election, the blue camp joined forces to pull Hsieh through.
Media incidents, such as attacks on the central government and inappropriate corruption investigations by police from the Ministry of the Interior, have all been bad for the DPP. It was an achievement for You even to maintain basic support. Illusions about winning were simply a matter of trying to turn unrealistic, subjective hopes into objective fact.
You, a Hualien native with an advanced education and good reputation, returned to his hometown for what could have been a moving story. However, setting up a permanent office only following several elections,he was left with little room to maneuver when opponents accused him of leaving after electoral defeats and returning before elections. There is much culture and history to develop in Hualien and Taitung, and many environmental issues to be resolved. You, a scholar and an intellectual, should have gathered friends from cultural and social circles early on, to research Hualien and Taitung history and geography, and propose more visionary and idealistic opinions. Not doing so, but issuing checks and making promises only when an election approaches, makes the claim of being public-policy oriented difficult. If it wasn't for the green banner still being ideologically legitimate in Taiwan, the election result could have been even worse.
You's defeat, however, is not the defeat of an individual. Since the DPP's ascent to power, its reform image has faded. The distribution of talented people has maintained the old system rather than being innovative, and there is an atmosphere within the party that defeat is better than sticking to ideology. The party is still doing well in some southern counties and cities where it used to be strong. But how could it break through if it is unable to ignite the passion from the tangwai (outside the KMT) era, with idealistic talented people and a reform agenda? I hope the defeat in Hualien will serve as a warning to the DPP in next year's presidential election.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate research fellow in the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under