SARS seems to have left us. In the last few days the hustle and bustle of Taiwan has returned and political invective has sprung up once again. Although many public places still continue to take body temperatures at their doors, we are in a better frame of mind to gradually accept it as a routine practice and the tense atmosphere is no longer present.
Is it possible that SARS will have no ripple effect from now on? Chiu Hei-yuan, a professor of sociology at National Taiwan University, raised this question at a workshop on "risk management and social reconstruction in the post-SARS period," sponsored by the National Youth Commission and the National Association for the Promotion of Community Universities.
If Taiwan cannot sort out the valuable experience of how the government and the people can work together on epidemic prevention, will we panic and repeat past failures should SARS strike us again in the fall?
In several workshops of a similar kind held recently, no expert or academic from any domain dared to take it lightly. Whether they look at the situation systemically -- dealing with public health, medical care and epidemic prevention -- or proactively -- dealing with information dissemination, mobilization of resources and community participation -- they believed that in-depth innovative reforms must be implemented in order to set up a comprehensive system. This will offer proper preparation for the "risk society."
Indeed, it is possible that the experts' "inventory of knowledge" may completely lose efficacy in the face of challenges from new risks. This can increase the difficulty of risk perception, risk identification, risk calculation, risk assessment and even risk control. It can also make the public's confidence in the government waver, thereby increasing the dangers of uncertainty in modern times.
In the case of SARS, the lack of risk awareness among the nation's medical workers created not only a weak spot in epidemic prevention but also a mass panic that provoked the public to overestimate the risk after the shutdown of the Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital. The end result was a disorderly scene in which people rushed to buy masks but did not know how to use them.
It also revealed that Taiwan lacked orderly ways in risk communication, because knowledge was unable to be converted in time into information that could be easily understood and obtained by the public. The "marginal utility" of panic control could not be brought into full play.
In an investigative report on the social situation during the SARS period, the Academia Sinica compared the extent to which the general public in Taiwan and in Hong Kong believed the media.
In Taiwan, one third of people "completely believed" the electronic media and the print media while in Hong Kong less than one half did.
Besides risk perception and risk communication, the SARS lesson on the issue of risk governance includes political, economic, social and cultural elements, and should not be treated simplistically.
When "civic awareness" is not evident and there is a lack of "public domain" to reach a consensus, the power and prestige of politics and science can possibly collapse overnight to almost paralyze society.
In the past, "crisis management" took the form of command from the top down. The more effective way of risk governance should adopt the form of two-way communication, emphasizing the building of organic network relations among private institutions, communities and non-profit organizations. With close interaction and mutual trust, these groups can then set up a platform for the flow of information, complementary resources and mobile division of labor.
With regard to the governance of public risk, individuals should also realize that it is neither the business of other people nor the business of government. Rather, each and every citizen has the right and responsibility to share the risks of modernity. This kind of governance philosophy with democratic participation and the spirit of a civic society happens to be in sharp contrast to totalitarian or authoritarian governance. It can be a model of choice to go along with Taiwan's development direction.
In sum, SARS has made the shocked Taiwanese discover the need for deep self-reflection. The leading economic values that people have believed in without any doubt for a very long time, profit-driven and market-oriented medical policies, and even people's tendency to pay no attention at all to public affairs should be criticized and reviewed.
We hope Taiwan can soon set up a new two-way risk governance model to let it make people identify and get a better understanding of profit and risk. The new model should clear up possible entanglements of dangers. The many strata of society should be taken into account in this model, such as individuals, groups, political economic systems and social-ethical standards. It should also take on risk simulation to find the best ways of handling potential dangers. After all, there must be risks ahead of us. Haven't we learned the lesson?
Ku Chung-hwa is a professor of sociology at National Chengchi University and an executive committee member of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and