When volunteer Atsuhito Nakata was shot dead while monitoring Cambodian elections in 1993 it sent shock waves through Japan and sparked debate on ending the nation's first postwar peacekeeping operation.
A decade later, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi will be taking a serious political gamble if he goes ahead with plans to send troops to Iraq in what would be Japan's biggest military deployment overseas since World War II.
Nearly 60 years after the last Japanese soldier fired a weapon in combat, the nation's public remains allergic to anything resembling military aggression -- a mindset likely to affect voters' response if a Japanese soldier kills or is killed.
"It's an immense risk," said Takashi Inoguchi, a political scientist at the University of Tokyo.
"Many people tend to think soldiers landing in a foreign land is close to military aggression, which we more or less promised not to repeat half a century ago," Inoguchi said.
"The public reaction [to casualties] would first be for a big majority to say `You made a mistake'," he added. "But if the figures can be kept low, they might be persuaded."
Legislation paving the way for Japan to send about 1,000 troops to help rebuild war-torn Iraq is expected to be enacted next week. Koizumi has insisted that troops will be sent only to areas "free of military conflict."
"Once the law passes, we will have to carefully consider the situation in Iraq," he told reporters last Thursday. "We will send our troops to a non-war zone to do what's best for the people of Iraq."
Critics argue that such a distinction is impossible given a series of attacks on US and British soldiers since President George W. Bush declared major combat over in Iraq in May.
Already, top Japanese officials are showing signs of wanting to keep Japanese soldiers out of harm's way.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda said last Thursday it would be difficult to send troops to the Iraqi town of Balad, where a US military base has come under attack.
"The security situation is not good," Fukuda, Japan's top government spokesman, told a news conference when asked about reports that Washington was pressing for Japanese troops to be sent to Balad, 90km north of the capital.
"Under the current circumstances, it would be difficult" for Japan to dispatch troops there, he said.
In a nod to the danger Japanese soldiers will face, the Defense Agency plans to raise the maximum death benefits for troops killed in Iraq to Japanese Yen 100 million (US$846,600) from the current Japanese Yen 70 million, a Japanese newspaper reported last Wednesday.
"It is expected that some casualties ... may take place," Inoguchi said. "You can't save just Japanese soldiers."
Japan has been testing the limits of its pacifist Constitution for the past decade, boosting the ability of the military to project its power abroad.
The pace of change increased after the Sept. 11 attacks.
Eager to avoid the embarrassment suffered in the Gulf War, when Japan gave cash but no troops, Tokyo enacted a law to let it provide logistical support for the US-led war in Afghanistan.
Koizumi also lent staunch moral support to the US-led war on Iraq despite opposition by the vast majority of voters.
But Koizumi's popularity ratings are at about 50 percent -- high for a Japanese leader after more than two years in office.
Some wonder whether the public outcry over Japanese military casualties would be nearly as great as imagined, especially given the government's implicit linkage of the need to support America in Iraq with ensuring Washington would come to the rescue if North Korea attacked.
But cynics say Koizumi could well delay deployment of Japanese troops to Iraq until after a general election that many pundits expect this autumn, so as to escape any negative fallout.
"He's going to put it off at least until after the [ruling Liberal Democratic Party] LDP presidential race in September and may put it off until after the general election," said Gerald Curtis, a Columbia University political science professor.
"Who knows what Iraq will look like in November? If the situation continues to deteriorate ... it may be very difficult to send them at all," he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs