If you want respect, show muscle -- or so Iranian leaders may have reasoned when they confirmed their completion of tests of a medium-range ballistic missile capable of hitting Israel and other countries in the region.
Already accused by the US of seeking nuclear arms and delivery systems, Iran announced on Monday that the "final test" of the Shahab-3 missile had taken place a few weeks ago.
The timing was doubly sensitive in view of this week's visit to Tehran by Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the UN nuclear watchdog, who will press Iran to open its nuclear power program and prove it is not secretly developing atomic bombs.
"It's slightly surprising because they have been trying to calm fears they are going down the nuclear route," Tim Garden, a defense expert at London's Royal Institute of International Affairs, said of Iran's disclosure of progress on the Shahab-3.
Israel, which falls within the missile's 1,300km range, points to Iran's nuclear and missile ambitions as a deadly threat and wants the world to thwart them.
Indeed, some Iranians believe that last week's Israeli media reports about the Shahab-3 test were deliberately designed to force an Iranian response and keep the heat on Tehran.
Iran denies seeking nuclear arms or harboring aggressive intentions, but sees the Shahab-3 as a vital deterrent against the Jewish state, the Middle East's only nuclear power.
It also perceives a threat from the US, which has forces in Iraq, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other countries within reach of the Shahab-3.
"It's more of a deterrent than anything else," said Ali Ansari, an Iranian academic at Britain's Durham University.
He said the missile program had sprung from the 1980 to 1988 Iran-Iraq war, when Iraqi Scud missiles were crashing into Tehran and Iran lacked the means to retaliate.
"It's also to do with having strategic reach, not just to deter Israelis, but other potential enemies. There is a prestige factor. They feel it's what a regional power should have," he said.
The US, which has called Iran part of an "axis of evil," gives short shrift to Iranian security logic.
"We've seen Iran's efforts to develop its missile capabilities, including flight testing, as a threat to the region and a threat to US interests in the region," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said on Monday.
But Iranian political analyst Amir Ali Nourbakhsh said Iran must be given security assurances if it was to bow to pressure to sign the additional protocol to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that would permit more intrusive inspections.
"Maybe the Shahab-3 could deter Israel, even if it does not have a nuclear warhead, but the US and the EU should assure Iran that its security won't be undermined if it signs the additional protocol," Nourbakhsh said.
The Shahab-3, first tested in 1998, is based on the North Korean Nodong-1 missile but has been improved with Russian technology. Questions remain about its effectiveness.
"They have had real problems with the testing of this," said Robin Hughes, deputy news editor of Jane's Defence Weekly, adding that the latest launch followed several failed ones.
He said it was not clear if the missile was already in operational service with the armed forces and or how accurate it was. "It would be a disaster if they got it wrong," he said.
Uzi Rubin, co-founder of Israel's Arrow anti-missile system, said word on the Shahab-3's readiness was no surprise.
"The Iranians have long made clear their intention to develop the missile, with Israel as its intended target. One of the threats we had in mind in developing the Arrow was a long-range Iranian missile," he said.
"The Shahab-3 can deliver whatever warhead the Iranians come up with. If they have nuclear capability, then they can have a long-range nuclear missile. The Shahab would be less successful with biological or chemical agents, however," Rubin added.
While Iran denies trying to make atomic bombs, stretched Scuds like the Shahab-3 could be used to deliver them.
"There is an unspoken affinity between a nuclear program and missiles of this sort," said Ian Bellany, professor of politics at Britain's Lancaster University.
ElBaradei renewed his call for Iran to sign the additional protocol to the NPT when he met President Mohammad Khatami and atomic energy chief Gholamreza Aghazadeh last Wednesday.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs