If you want respect, show muscle -- or so Iranian leaders may have reasoned when they confirmed their completion of tests of a medium-range ballistic missile capable of hitting Israel and other countries in the region.
Already accused by the US of seeking nuclear arms and delivery systems, Iran announced on Monday that the "final test" of the Shahab-3 missile had taken place a few weeks ago.
The timing was doubly sensitive in view of this week's visit to Tehran by Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the UN nuclear watchdog, who will press Iran to open its nuclear power program and prove it is not secretly developing atomic bombs.
"It's slightly surprising because they have been trying to calm fears they are going down the nuclear route," Tim Garden, a defense expert at London's Royal Institute of International Affairs, said of Iran's disclosure of progress on the Shahab-3.
Israel, which falls within the missile's 1,300km range, points to Iran's nuclear and missile ambitions as a deadly threat and wants the world to thwart them.
Indeed, some Iranians believe that last week's Israeli media reports about the Shahab-3 test were deliberately designed to force an Iranian response and keep the heat on Tehran.
Iran denies seeking nuclear arms or harboring aggressive intentions, but sees the Shahab-3 as a vital deterrent against the Jewish state, the Middle East's only nuclear power.
It also perceives a threat from the US, which has forces in Iraq, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other countries within reach of the Shahab-3.
"It's more of a deterrent than anything else," said Ali Ansari, an Iranian academic at Britain's Durham University.
He said the missile program had sprung from the 1980 to 1988 Iran-Iraq war, when Iraqi Scud missiles were crashing into Tehran and Iran lacked the means to retaliate.
"It's also to do with having strategic reach, not just to deter Israelis, but other potential enemies. There is a prestige factor. They feel it's what a regional power should have," he said.
The US, which has called Iran part of an "axis of evil," gives short shrift to Iranian security logic.
"We've seen Iran's efforts to develop its missile capabilities, including flight testing, as a threat to the region and a threat to US interests in the region," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said on Monday.
But Iranian political analyst Amir Ali Nourbakhsh said Iran must be given security assurances if it was to bow to pressure to sign the additional protocol to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that would permit more intrusive inspections.
"Maybe the Shahab-3 could deter Israel, even if it does not have a nuclear warhead, but the US and the EU should assure Iran that its security won't be undermined if it signs the additional protocol," Nourbakhsh said.
The Shahab-3, first tested in 1998, is based on the North Korean Nodong-1 missile but has been improved with Russian technology. Questions remain about its effectiveness.
"They have had real problems with the testing of this," said Robin Hughes, deputy news editor of Jane's Defence Weekly, adding that the latest launch followed several failed ones.
He said it was not clear if the missile was already in operational service with the armed forces and or how accurate it was. "It would be a disaster if they got it wrong," he said.
Uzi Rubin, co-founder of Israel's Arrow anti-missile system, said word on the Shahab-3's readiness was no surprise.
"The Iranians have long made clear their intention to develop the missile, with Israel as its intended target. One of the threats we had in mind in developing the Arrow was a long-range Iranian missile," he said.
"The Shahab-3 can deliver whatever warhead the Iranians come up with. If they have nuclear capability, then they can have a long-range nuclear missile. The Shahab would be less successful with biological or chemical agents, however," Rubin added.
While Iran denies trying to make atomic bombs, stretched Scuds like the Shahab-3 could be used to deliver them.
"There is an unspoken affinity between a nuclear program and missiles of this sort," said Ian Bellany, professor of politics at Britain's Lancaster University.
ElBaradei renewed his call for Iran to sign the additional protocol to the NPT when he met President Mohammad Khatami and atomic energy chief Gholamreza Aghazadeh last Wednesday.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry