Democracy in Asia has experienced a downward slide. The leader of Myanmar's democratic movement, Aung San Suu Kyi, has been detained by Myanmar's junta since early last month after a bloody incident during a demonstration. The Hong Kong government has been trying to enact the infamous Article 23, which would have a devastating effect on the freedom of the people of Hong Kong. Their freedom has been eroding since the handover to China in 1997. More than 500,000 people marched last week to protest the proposed law. The prospects for Asian democracy at the beginning of the 21st century seem bleak.
The people of Taiwan have been jolted by a different matter. According to press reports, the US was trying to dissuade the government from holding referendums, out of concern that this could lead to a plebiscite on independence.
The issue of whether the US government had voiced opposition against Taiwan's domestic affairs was not addressed for almost a week until American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal clarified Washington's position. This clarification was made after a poll was released, which showed that more than 60 percent of respondents would support holding a referendum even there was external opposition.
The three seemingly unrelated events are all about Asia's democratic progression. The Hong Kong protesters were trying to protect their eroding freedom, Suu Kyi represents the difficult path toward Burmese democracy and Taiwan's case is about how to consolidate its democracy. The threat to democracy in the three cases can be traced back to the same source: China.
Beijing has demanded the Hong Kong government pass a national security law. China has provided the critical economic and international support for the Myanmar junta to survive and continue its oppression against democratic activists. The Chinese threat of military escalation is the reason behind the US govern-ment's concern that Taiwan might hold a referendum. These three places are connected by a com-mon concern for democracy and the common threat from China.
Thus, supporting democracy seems to be more important than ever. While the international com-munity needs to continue to urge the Myanmar regime to release Suu Kyi and the Hong Kong government to reconsider enacting its version of Article 23, the international community should encourage Taiwan to take the necessary steps to consolidate its newly established democracy. Denying a people the opportunity to hold a referendum is not compatible with democracy.
But there are other important reasons to support a referendum in Taiwan. First, voices for referendums have not receded over the past 10 years of democratization. This phenomenon that there is an apparent defect in the democratic apparatus, which shows that a gap between the elected representatives and public opinions is widening. The public is frustrated at being increasingly alienated from the political process.
Referendums, which enable direct public political participation, could help to address this issue.
Second, the SARS epidemic exposed the weakness in people's commitment to democracy -- given the complaints from leading figures that democracy itself hampered the efficiency of the nation's crisis management. A popular exercise of democracy will not only reinforce people's belief in democracy, but could also serve as an effective tool to address fears about democratic governments' abilities to deal with crises. The SARS episode strengthened the people's feeling of international isolation.
Referendums could serve as a useful tool to counteract this overwhelming negative social sentiment.
The path to democracy is never easy and can be easily turned back, as shown by Germany's Weimer republic in the 1920s and Japan's Taisho democracy. For a place where discourse claims democracy is incompatible with "Asian values," support for Taiwan's democratic consolidation is all the more important. If democracy is not just the "alternation of parties" and a "peaceful transfer of power," but to upgrade the entire community into a mature society that is not afraid of making choices, then we should not discourage Taiwanese from taking the choice.
Media reports said a US senior official told a Taiwanese legislative delegation last month that the people of Taiwan would be responsible for the consequences of whatever actions their government took. That is exactly right.
If the Taiwanese never make a decision by themselves, how will they ever feel responsible for the consequences? Isn't this is what democracy is all about -- learning to be responsible? For the sake of democracy, let's give referendums a chance.
Lai I-chug is director of foreign policy studies at the Taiwan Thinktank.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under