Goats graze near rambling rows of wooden cottages, the smell of fresh cut grass wafts on the breeze, pails rattle at the well as a small village by the Russian capital passes another uneventful day.
Less idyllic are two teetering men who rise from the undergrowth at minute intervals. They swing blows at each other, miss each time and fall from view in a tragicomic testament to Russia's enduring curse of alcoholism, most visible in daily life in the countryside.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Today, thousands of Russian villages are ravaged by unemployment and poverty, while widespread and fearsome alcohol abuse nudges many communities closer to extinction.
Rural settlements across the country tell the same pitiful story.
After the 1991 collapse, local factories and farms that used to provide work closed down, leaving little more than the bottle to occupy the days for many men and a sizeable contingent of women.
Most subsist on scant welfare payments, the produce they grow in their allotments and what remaining possessions they can sell.
"They've nothing to live for and nothing to die for," concluded a London-based journalist after an eye-opening trip outside the city.
A native Muscovite adds: "It's difficult to say why it's like this in Russia -- are things this bad because the men drink or do they drink because things are this bad?"
In fact, one has to go back almost as far as the original chicken and egg to make any sense of the boozing phenomenon.
Tsarina Catherine II let her people drink their fill in the 18th century, reputedly saying that "a nation of drunks is easier to rule than one in which the people are sober."
The same principle applied in the 1970s era of stagnation under Communist chief Leonid Brezhnev, when the Soviet state ensured plentiful cheap vodka for town and village dwellers alike to compensate for deprivations and to keep the populace pliable.
Unsurprisingly, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was widely resented for his anti-alcoholism campaign in the late-1980s, when the state choked supplies of vodka, wine and champagne in a bid to get the country back on its feet.
Instead, inventive Russians got busy distilling their own heady and often fatal alcoholic concoctions using ingredients like toothpaste or shoepolish.
Today, the only restriction is your budget, and vodka remains absurdly cheap at about a dollar for half a liter. Head into the country and the 60 to 70 percent proof samogon moonshine made from yeast and sugar is cheaper still.
"There are villages where every single man is a drunk," said Oleg Zykov, president of the No to Narcotics and Alcohol Foundation, a nationwide non-profit organization in the front line of the battle.
And it's a hard battle to wage when the enemy is so well armed: Last year, Russia officially produced 1,387 billion liters of vodka and other spirits, a record amount for the past eight years.
Meanwhile, fake vodka, low-quality hooch and brute excess led to 40,121 registered deaths from alcohol poisoning last year, up six percent from the previous year. Alcohol abuse is also recognized as a key contributor to the low average male life expectancy of 57 years.
But if many hard-drinking Russians took their cue from Catherine II, Brezhnev or the oft inebriated example of former president Boris Yeltsin, a glimmer of hope is seen in the country's new, sporty and only moderately imbibing leader Vladimir Putin.
"It doesn't all boil down to the behavior of the president, but it's wonderful when a leader demonstrates a healthy lifestyle," said Zykov, optimistic that Russia can still undergo "moral and mental evolution" and beat its susceptibility to strong liquor.
It sounds well and good in Moscow and other large centers where at least a modicum of counselling and public outreach is available.
"Dad, don't drink" reads the slogan of a recent billboard campaign in the capital, with an accompanying picture of a boy's fearful face.
But out in the villages, where grass verges are strewn with buttercups and empty bottles and tomorrow is too empty a prospect to care about, some things seem beyond fixing.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
With China’s economy in the doldrums, people have been asking whether a slowing economy might make Chinese less supportive of a hypothetical invasion of Taiwan. With more pressing issues, such as healthcare, housing and cost of living, Chinese might be more concerned with developments inside their country, rather than “reunifying the motherland,” using the parlance of the Chinese Communist Party. “Ordinary Chinese people are not pushing the government to get unification,” one Chinese told al-Jazeera last week, adding: “It is the government that pushes people to believe that there must be unification.” University of Manchester China Institute research fellow Wang