As a beacon of resistance, she could not look more vulnerable. Ngawang Sangdrol is just 1.5m tall and very slight.
It is hard to imagine how a man armed with an iron bar could attack her, let alone a whole mob.
But until her release in March, she had defied that and worse while serving 11 years of a 21-year sentence for protesting against the Chinese occupation of her homeland. She is still only 25.
At the little house in Wapping where she is staying while in London, it is obvious that prison and beatings have taken their toll.
She walks stiffly, with a bow in her legs. She suffers pain in her kidneys and while we talk unconsciously massages her head, as near-constant headaches are the legacy of a savage attack by guards in 1998.
Ngawang has become a relentless traveller since being allowed to leave Tibet for medical treatment, meeting politicians and human rights groups who worked for her release. But the kind of peaceful resistance advocated by the Dalai Lama doesn't get the attention it used to in a world where people blow themselves up in crowded streets.
She was first arrested, aged 13, in 1990 -- one of a handful of young women from Garu nunnery near Lhasa who demonstrated for a free Tibet at a festival near the Norbulingka, the Dalai Lama's old summer palace.
"Police grabbed us and started beating us," she said. "Then they threw us in a truck. At the prison there was a mob waiting and they immediately started beating us."
Ngawang was beginning 11 years of imprisonment and torture, which made a mockery of China's judicial commitment to respect the rights of children. Offered a document to sign renouncing her support for the Dalai Lama, she refused and served nine months in Lhasa's notorious Drapchi jail.
Guards beat her with iron pipes and stuck electric batons in her mouth, even taping electric wires to her tongue. Her hands were tied behind her back and she was hung by her wrists from the ceiling.
She was released in 1991 to find herself alone. Her father and one of her brothers remained in Drapchi as political prisoners and her mother had died. Ngawang earned a little money running an illegal stall in a Lhasa market. As a former political prisoner, she was not entitled to a work permit, neither could she return to her nunnery.
With three monks and another nun, she went to the Barkhor, a street by the Jokhang temple, Tibetan Buddhism's spiritual centre.
They chanted slogans demanding independence. This time she was sentenced to three years. She was 15.
The nuns imprisoned at Drapchi, most little more than children, have become legends of resistance to the Tibetans. By the mid-1990s, at the height of a renewed period of repression, the Lhasa authorities had locked up 163 nuns. Ngawang, particularly defiant, became a focus for opposition and she was singled out for even more abuse than the other nuns.
With a half-smile she said: "Maybe they didn't like me."
Now she is again using her freedom to draw attention to the plight of Tibetans. State control is absolute; if Tibetans protest, the right to work, freedom of association and the right to practise religion are taken away. To stop political activists from becoming nuns or monks, the authorities now issue permits to those seeking to join religious institutions.
"As soon as you are politically involved, you don't have any rights," Ngawang said.
The guard running Ngawang's unit was a Tibetan called Pema Butri. She would call the nuns "evil spirits" and saw herself as a spiritual woman, demanding respect from the nuns as though a great lama herself.
Despite such tight control, a tape recorder was smuggled into the prison. A group of 13 nuns recorded protest songs which were later released on an album by human rights organizations. For her part in the enterprise, Ngawang was given an extra six years and put in solitary confinement. Denied food and blankets, she was kept awake at night.
She recited long prayers she had memorized, and made a rosary from the threads in her shirt, which she hid from the guards. Other prisoners went on hunger strike to protest against her treatment.
"When they attacked me, of course I was afraid. They wanted to make me say the things they wanted to hear. But I was ready to die. They will never take my heart," she said.
Twice more the authorities increased her sentence, in 1996 for eight years after she defied a programme of "patriotic" education. In 1998, after a demonstration against the raising of the Chinese flag over the prison, five nuns died from wounds sustained in the rioting or, as the Chinese claim, at their own hands.
Kate Saunders, an independent Tibet analyst, commented: "Ngawang's release demonstrates China's concern for the `face' it presents to the world under the presidency of Hu Jintao (
Few Western governments will condemn the Chinese, for fear of antagonizing them. Late last month, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw met his Chinese counterpart, Li Zhaoxing (
The following day, Straw publicly launched a government handbook, Combating Torture, to mark UN International Day in Support of Victims of Torture and signed new protocols to the UN Convention Against Torture. That day, junior Foreign Office Minister Bill Rammell was meeting Ngawang in private -- to avoid embarrassing Li.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations