Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's recent visit to China, the first such visit by an Indian prime minister in almost a decade, may well prove to be a turning point in Sino-Indian relations.
The visit marked important progress in the bilateral relationship. Beijing and New Delhi signed a joint declaration on principles for relations and comprehensive cooperation, a memorandum of understanding on opening border trade, and a series of bilateral agreements covering cultural, educational, and scientific/technological cooperation.
While no major breakthrough was achieved during Vajpayee's visit -- and indeed no such expectation had ever been entertained -- there was nevertheless significant progress in four areas that deserves closer scrutiny.
The first is growing consensus and converging interest between Beijing and New Delhi over a wide range of bilateral, regional and global issues. The two countries vow not to view each other as a security threat and reaffirm their determination to resolve their disputes through peaceful means. This is a far cry from the suspicions and hostility between the two Asian powers in the wake of India's May 1998 nuclear tests.
This stabilizing and maturing relationship is clearly marked by the two countries' converging interests in developing a fair, equitable international political and economic order, the role for the UN and support of global arms control processes, including efforts to prevent the weaponization of outer space.
Second, by each appointing a special representative to oversee the political framework of border negotiation, the two countries have clearly demonstrated their determination to speed up the process of resolving the territorial disputes. This reflects a consensus reached by Chinese and Indian leaders that to reach the full potential of bilateral relations requires the satisfactory -- and the sooner the better -- closure of this issue.
Third, China and India have made important -- although largely token -- gestures toward each other. New Delhi has shown greater appreciation of Beijing's sensitivity over the Tibetan issue by affirming for the first time that the Tibetan Autonomous Region is part of the territory of China. Beijing, on the other hand, has acquiesced in Sikkim being a state of India through the memorandum of understanding on expanding border trade.
Finally, Vajpayee's visit was marked by its economic orientation. A large entourage of Indian business executives accompanied the Indian prime minister and of Vajpayee's three important speeches delivered during his visit, two were addressed at business venues. Indeed, with bilateral trade reaching US$5 billion annually and growing at a phenomenal 70 percent in the first quarter this year, Beijing and New Delhi hold high hopes that two-way trade could reach US$10 billion by 2005.
The coming months and years will show whether the good-will and momentum generated by Vajpayee's successful visit can be maintained. Clearly, obstacles remain and sustained efforts at the highest political level are required to translate many of the blueprints can be realized.
Despite the generally benign atmosphere between the two countries, there remain lingering suspicion and distrust, and the scar of the 1962 war has yet to be healed. The two Asian giants' continuing upward trajectory in economic, military and political influence is bound to lead each into the other's perceived sphere of interests. Conflicts may arise. This requires strategic dialogues at regularized and high levels.
The two countries must find ways to resolve their territorial disputes. The Line of Actual Control, with some minor modifications, should be the starting point for negotiating a final settlement. The appointment of special representatives by the two governments is a step forward. However, final resolution of the issue requires not only political decisions (and courage) at the highest level in both capitals, but also the political skills to sell it to their respective domestic constituencies.
A stable Sino-Indian relationship requires the effective management of the delicate China-India-Pakistan triangle. Beijing should make greater efforts to address New Delhi's legitimate concerns over Chinese defense ties with Pakistan. While China's neutrality during the 1999 Kargil crisis demonstrates a more balanced South Asia policy, Beijing should also use its strong ties with Islamabad to play a more active role in facilitating diplomatic reconciliation between the two South Asian countries.
Vajpayee's recent visit to China not only has injected optimism and high expectations for Sino-Indian relations, it also has significant implications for US policy. A stable and even warming Sino-Indian relationship is not necessarily detrimental to US interests in the region; indeed, Beijing may have reduced incentives to provide Islamabad with sensitive items related to weapons of mass destruction, even as it continues to maintain close defense ties with the latter. However, Washington needs to take care of its relationship with New Delhi even as the war against terrorism requires more attention -- and assistance -- to Pakistan. The worst foreign policy folly that Washington could commit is an approach that appears to ignore New Delhi's importance and alienates Beijing, with the result that the budding Sino-Indian entente becomes an alliance against perceived US arrogance and hegemony.
Yuan Jing-dong is a senior research associate at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, and the co-author of China and India: Cooperation or Conflict?
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under