The dispute between the Cabinet and the Legislative Yuan over the increases in National Health Insurance (NHI) premiums and co-payment fees has dragged on forever. The Control Yuan on Wednesday issued an official correction of the Cabinet's "procedural flaws" -- the government implementing the rate hikes without informing the legislature.
In this highly politicized nation, many things are legally correct but politically incorrect, such as the legislature and Control Yuan's demand that the Cabinet report the controversial fee increases to the legislature. Then again, many things are politically correct but legally incorrect, such as the Cabinet's refusal to report the hikes to lawmakers. Although the three branches all speak eloquently, as if they were solely in the right, they are in fact acting out of political and electoral considerations.
The National Health Insurance Law (
The Cabinet knows what the blue camp wants, so it will not forward the rate hike to the legislature. After all, the Cabinet notes that it didn't forward the question of raising water and electricity fees or interest rates to the legislature. This is a bit far-fetched, however, because any legislative bill affecting the rights and duties of the people must receive legislative approval. This is a fundamental principle of parliamentary politics. The legislature also asked the Cabinet to investigate and set health insurance fees -- so shouldn't the results then be reported back to the legislature?
NHI fees were unchanged for eight years. A shortage of NHI subsidies to local governments has led to serious financial pressure on the national health-insurance system. The increase, less than 6 percent, is a reasonable measure to avoid having the insurance system go broke.
To avoid an expansion of the conflict, however, the Cabinet should resolve the issue as soon as possible. It should submit the issue to the legislature during the next legislative session, or ask the Council of Grand Justices to deliver a constitutional interpretation. The longer the debate drags on, the more complicated and difficult it will become to resolve, giving the opposition more reason to protest.
If a bill authorizing the 6 percent rate hike is submitted to the legislature, the lawmakers will have to follow legal procedures and can only choose between accepting or returning the bill. Unless the legislature first revokes the Cabinet's right to review NHI fees by amending the National Health Care Insurance Law, it cannot change the contents of a fee-hike bill.
The government and opposition stray far too easily from normal legal proceedings for the sake of expediency. Everyone can see what the correct legal action should be in this case -- everyone that is, except for the politicians and officials involved. They have grown too used to running roughshod over the legal system for quick political gains. No wonder the country is in such a mess.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under