Much information has been transmitted back to Taiwan in the course of the visit to the US by members of the legislature's National Defense Committee. Unfortunately, we have not heard of any privileges being won for Taiwan. On the contrary, we have seen the US propose to help Taiwan find loans to meet the costs of procuring arms.
The history of Taiwan's arms purchases from the US can be regarded as a drama in three acts. Act one corresponds to what is known as the period of "military aid." Having no worries about defense costs helped lay the foundation for Taiwan's economic miracle during this period.
The period after the US and Taiwan broke off relations and before the end of the Cold War amounted to the second act. In this period, Taiwan's economic strength made it one of the "Asian Tigers."
Under the constraints of the Taiwan Relations Act, Taiwan began to shoulder the burden of nearly 20 years of enormous military expenditures paid to the US.
What Taiwan obtained in return was obsolete, second-hand US military equipment. Despite having such flimsy armaments, Taiwan was able to peacefully enjoy a 20-year period of stability thanks to US backing.
As the saying goes, however, "a family's wealth won't last more than three generations, and a nation's wealth won't last more than 30 years."
In recent years, Taiwan's competitiveness has steadily declined. With the nation showing hesitation over the protection fees that it used to pay with alacrity, US-Taiwan relations concerning arms sales require adjustment.
US-Taiwan relations on the matter of arms sales seem to have entered into a third act, having progressed from military aid to depletion of the nation's defense budget as we did our utmost to shoulder the defense burden, and finally to today's reports of discussions about borrowing money to buy arms.
Could this be the intent of the arms merchants? Perhaps Taiwan has no choice but to respond by raising more money for arms expenses of nearly NT$400 billion.
But if arms purchases have gotten to the point where they necessitate borrowing, that is truly cause for sorrow.
We should mourn the fact that just to buy arms the government would have to borrow money, mourn the fact that Taiwan appears not to have another path that would allow us to escape investment in an escalating arms race and mourn the fact that this nation has been picked so clean.
Trong Chai is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the