The words of Paul Bremer, Washington's overlord in Iraq, need no "sexing up."
"We are going to fight them and impose our will on them and we will capture or ... kill them until we have imposed law and order on this country," he declared at the weekend. "We will dominate the scene and we will continue to impose our will on this country."
Neither General Dyer at Amritsar nor General William Westmoreland in Vietnam could have put it any clearer. Welcome to the new colonialism. Bremer's words are not just bluster. US forces are now engaged in massive search and destroy sweeps in central and northern Iraq against forces opposing their rule.
While the Westminster village remains riveted by the Campbell-BBC pillow fight, it is the real war on the ground in Iraq that should be commanding our attention. The six British soldiers killed last week, like the US servicemen under daily attack, are victims of an overbearing and inept occupation policy that is alienating ordinary Iraqis of all persuasions.
Civilian deaths, particularly of demonstrators, are mounting. Basic services and rights are in scant supply, with neither democracy nor a reliable water supply on offer to Iraqis. The only advanced program is for the privatization of state industry. This occupation, which has no modern precedence, should be at the center of political attention. Ending it needs to be at the heart of public activity.
For British Prime Minister Tony Blair has placed Britain at the service of the first major post-1991 attempt to fasten foreign domination by force on a sovereign country, an endeavor as unlawful as it is unwise. And there is no easy way out for the government. British troops in Iraq are now hostages to the Middle East policy of the Bush administration and its boundless appetite for domination.
As the occupation of Iraq increasingly appears as a springboard for a regime change offensive against Iran, the British troops controlling the Shia-dominated south of Iraq will be seen not as uninvited occupiers but as aggressors against their co-religionists.
If the recent warnings of Washington uberhawks US National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice and John Bolton -- that military action against Iran is a live option -- become fact, British forces will be caught up in the campaign, like it or not. And how often over the past 18 months have the musings of maniacs become official Bush administration policy faster than you can say "pre-emptive war?"
It is certainly hard to see US President George W. Bush willingly withdrawing the forces of his "coalition" from Iraq without first having a crack at toppling the Iranian government. Indeed, the US has no strategy for pacifying Iraq that does not involve challenging Iran. Thus is the traditional logic of 19th-century empire being replayed in the 21st: protecting one conquest requires an indefinite extension of conflict.
Blair seems to be up for this -- committed as he is to his own version of the "white man's burden", imposing New Labour values of market efficiency and moral hectoring on the world for its own good. He shows no signs whatever of wanting to unhook Britain from Bush's endless war against the "axis of evil" and beyond.
British Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon, for example, when not pledging thousands more troops to the Iraqi quagmire, has signalled a British willingness to sign up for the entirely lawless and manifestly dangerous US plan to board and search by force North Korean ships on the high seas.
But are the millions who marched against the Iraq war ready to acquiesce in the continuing, connected, crises of the Iraqi occupation and plans for renewed war? Parliament may be dozing, the public is increasingly alarmed. The anti-war movement is once again gaining momentum, its aim both to prevent the next war and indict the government for the now transparent lies it told to justify the last one. It is time for British politics -- the labor movement above all -- to wake up to what is being done in our name.
Last week's killings in Majar al-Kabir will be only the beginning unless the government is held to account for its subordination to the "new American century" project, and the mendacity it has deployed to sustain that policy.
Dead British soldiers -- but no weapons of mass destruction discovered. The balance sheet of Blair's Iraq adventure is deteriorating fast. Yet the prime minister is to accept a Congressional gold medal for his part in imposing Bush's will on Iraq. He will not be doing so on behalf of the British people.
Perhaps Alastair Campbell should recommend a private ceremony.
Andrew Murray is chair of the UK Stop the War Coalition.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry