The referendum issue has increased tensions between the ruling and opposition camps and has made cross-strait relations tense as well. Even the US has stepped in to apply pressure.
\nWhether we speak of plebiscites on major issues affecting the nation's sovereignty or territory, or of referendums for amending the Constitution, or directly consulting the public on policy issues -- in either case we are affirming that ultimately sovereignty lies in the hands of the public.
\nA referendum is the public's ultimate weapon. It can express the general will of the public and it also serves as a weapon for the public to use against the political elite. If there is incompetence or corruption among the political elite, or if they don't decide on policies that are beneficial to the people, or if they make decisions that run counter to the people's interests, then the public can express its will through a referendum and exercise political power.
\nIf a referendum is held on a question of domestic policy, it might not involve international or external factors, but referendums related to sovereign territory and foreign policy would do so.
\nFor this reason, many people fear that a referendum on joining the World Health Organization will lead to even greater pressure from China and the US. This kind of threat or warning is often directed at the political elite. This also reveals a bizarre phenomenon -- referendums are first and foremost an expression of the public will and should not be manipulated by the political elite.
\nBut the setting of the agenda is frequently done by the political elite. This is why there are always considerations of the political elite's own interests involved in referendum issues.
\nThe public usually plays the role of a receptor of information and opinion. Members of the political elite advocating different proposals attempt to lobby the public, thereby forcing the public to make a choice among a small number of elite candidates. A referendum is designed to help the public break free of this passive role and allow citizens to make their own choice. To achieve this, it is necessary to have a population of citizens who think clearly and carefully.
\nEvery citizen may not have the specialized knowledge and skills of the elite, but a civil society believes that citizens can cultivate the skills to judge between suggestions from the elite as well as participate in political discussions. This ability to think clearly and carefully requires that society create a public forum for objective discussions of opinion. Only then will citizens develop a policymaking ability.
\nWhether or not a given issue is put to a referendum, the political elite should always consult with the general public about it. Why carry out a referendum? What repercussions might there be? These questions should be the focus of discussion in public forums between members of the political elite and among the public. They should not be answered by the political elite alone in a provocative or threatening way.
\nReferendums can be a way of training citizens to think clearly and carefully. Whether or not this can be accomplished, the political elite must respect the will of the people.
\nThe weapon of referendums should be in the hands of the people and should not be a tool that political figures can use at their discretion.
\nIf President Chen Shui-bian (
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if