The public has gained confidence in the government since Lee Ming-liang (
During an anti-SARS meeting, both Chen and Chang Heng (張珩), another medical expert who recently took over as director of Taipei City's Bureau of Health, revealed their true feelings and wept when they talked about the fight against the disease. People must have been touched when they saw this. They must have felt lucky to have these professional and sincere heroes willing to serve at the front line when the island is severely challenged by the epidemic.
Most people are unaware of these academics' professional achievements. However, on the one hand, they trust the scientific community more, believing that it follows more objective and stricter standards. On the other hand, these academics are not as slippery as most politicians when they talk. As a result, the audience gets a sense of trust when watching them announcing the latest SARS statistics or teaching people how to prevent the disease.
Still, since they are involved in politics now, are they capable of dealing with political issues? Didn't Lee resign his post as the DOH director-general last year due to his "politically incorrect" National Health Insurance premium hikes?
The public distrusts some government officials because they are far too political. Will these academics fail to accomplish their tasks because they are not political enough? It's particularly worrisome that if these experts at the front line eventually step down for political reasons, the public will be even more disappointed with the government.
My worries are not groundless. From Chen's failure to attend a WHA meeting in Geneva, to his department's criticism of the WHO after the organization delayed removing Taiwan from its travel-warning list and Chen's negative reaction to PFP Legislator Kao Ming-chien's (
Chen and his colleagues have worked so hard to battle the epidemic. But they have been treated unfairly by the WHO while also facing Beijing's dirty tricks. Their discontent is understandable. But the public expects them to accomplish the SARS prevention work, not to wage a diplomatic war. Didn't Chen know that he was not allowed to participate in the WHA meeting before his departure? Why did the DOH hold a press conference to recklessly condemn the WHO for not lifting its travel warning on Taiwan while the department itself was not aware of the complete information? Why didn't Chen attack Kao for not representing Taiwan until the latter arrived in Kuala Lumpur for the WHO meeting? What good will this do, apart from turning Taiwan into a joke in front of the world, while causing a war of words domestically?
The public does not expect our medical experts to become political bureaucrats. But it is hoped that they can have enough political wisdom to deal with political problems. If they can't develop such wisdom in a short time, the government leaders who pushed them to the front line should protect them from being hurt by politics.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under