As we await the precise wording of the latest edict from the US, we had better refrain from obvious cat-calling of a country born as a result of a popular rebellion against unelected authority, which has been an ardent proselytizer of democratic values, conspiring with the unelected dictators in Beijing to frustrate popular democracy in Taiwan.
Let us, more usefully, reiterate just why a referendum is in fact the most pressing political issue in this country today.
If reports are accurate, China has said, and the US "acknowledged," that it is opposed to a referendum on anything in Taiwan as it sees this as a Pandora's box for Taiwan's independence. No matter how local the issue is, nor how contentious -- the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is the obvious choice -- China sees the use of a referendum to decide such issues creating a precedent for decision making on contention issues that it does not want to see.
Of course it is not in Beijing's interest for its own people to see Taiwanese being consulted directly on issues of importance, although, given China's media control and widespread ignorance about Taiwan, this is a secondary problem.
What China wants is sovereignty over Taiwan, pure and simple. And it understands one central point: a referendum motion to reunify with China will never secure majority support among Taiwanese, not now, and while the communists remain in power, not ever. That does not mean that it cannot "recover" Taiwan; simply that, for it to do so, Taiwanese must not be allowed to have a say.
To this end, for the last couple of years it has been planning with various emissaries from the KMT and PFP the terms of a deal to be proposed to Taiwan if the blue-camp parties were to recover power, something both Beijing and the parties themselves expect to happen at the next presidential election.
Interestingly -- and the US should pick up on this -- the most reliable reports of what has been talked about come from US academics with their contacts among Beijing's cadres and think tanks.
What appears to be the deal on offer is that the blue camp will accept something close to the expanded "one country, two systems" deal that has been on offer for well over a decade. In return Beijing will support the transition of Taiwan back to a one-party state with the blue camp in charge. Having lost power once, the blues have decided that they will never run that risk again and Beijing can help them in this regard. The emasculating of Taiwan's democracy and the erosion of its civil liberties -- think here of post-handover Hong Kong -- will swiftly follow.
For this ugly scenario to play as scripted it is essential that the people of Taiwan never have a chance to vote on the reunification question. They must be allowed to vote in the presidential election -- which the blue camp thinks it can win on the economy -- and then never consulted again. It is essential to the reunificationist plan, a plan that, by the way, will destroy democracy in anything but name in Taiwan -- even the Soviet Union held elections, remember -- that there is no precedent for asking the people, via a democratic process, what they think.
And this is where the US seems to have fallen badly for a piece of Chinese flimflam. The referendum question has never been about Taiwan voting for independence. That is not what referendum advocates -- at least the realists among them -- seek. It is about Taiwanese being consulted about any change to their future, as a safeguard from having reunification thrust unwillingly upon them. That is why China and the blue camp are so opposed to referendums, because they think they can, on the basis of a presidential election win and platitudes about "representative democracy," bring off this coup through an undemocratic end-around.
Is this really what the US wants to support?
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under