They may be worlds apart, but those pacing the lush green paddy fields of Cambodia and some in Washington's corridors of power share a common concern -- the southeast Asian nation's elections next month.
Scarred by decades of war and bloody turmoil, including the genocide of the Khmer Rouge, elections mean only one thing for many of deeply impoverished Cambodia's 13 million people: the possible return of strife, maybe even fighting.
A landmark UN-backed election in 1993 and the last general election five years later were both marred by violence, bitter disputes over the result and grave political crises.
"I am unsure what will happen," said Kim Peing, a teacher, at a recent political rally by Prime Minister Hun Sen and his ruling Cambodian People's Party (CPP). "Now it is calm, but you never know what could happen. People are scared."
Meanwhile, for those in US foreign policy circles with a keen eye on the rebuilding of "failed states", the worry is that billions of dollars in international aid over the last decade have not created the liberal democracy they would wish.
Mitch McConnell, chairman of the senate's powerful Foreign Affairs Appropriations Committee and a staunch Republican, has even equated Hun Sen, a former Khmer Rouge guerrilla, to the junta in Myanmar.
Although McConnell has toned down calls for "regime change" in Myanmar and Cambodia -- a stance that appalled many diplomats in Phnom Penh -- Secretary of State Colin Powell is due to follow up on what he has described as the Cambodian "situation" at a security summit in Phnom Penh on June 18.
Climate of fear
Cambodia's undisputed leader from 1998 onwards, Hun Sen has brought the war-ravaged country its first five straight years of peace for nearly 40 years, although critics accuse him of ruling with an iron fist.
With his main rival for the last 10 years, the royalist party of Prince Norodom Ranariddh, divided and demoralized, Hun Sen's victory on July 27 is not in doubt, but despite this, Cambodia's 10-year-old democracy might appear fairly healthy.
There is a vocal opposition, 23 parties are registered for the polls and the bright blue campaign signs of the three main parties adorn roadsides across the land.
But the flame of political freedom is not burning quite as brightly as many in Washington might wish.
Normally happy to talk to journalists about anything under the sun, most ordinary people -- at least in Kompong Cham, Cambodia's most populous and politically fractious province -- clam up the moment politics is mentioned.
"I dared to put up the party sign, but I don't dare talk about the elections," said Bunna, 43, an activist for the opposition Sam Rainsy Party, who would only give her first name.
In the countryside, shootings and violence -- sometimes political, sometimes criminal -- are common and few want to risk upsetting powerful grassroots officials, most of them part of Hun Sen's CPP machine.
The killings this year of a senior monk, a top royalist party aide and a prominent judge have sharpened the climate of fear, even though the government has blamed the shootings on crime, not politics.
Whatever the reasons, it is all grist to the mill of the anti-Hun Sen lobby on Capitol Hill.
"Murders of political activists, widespread intimidation and selective application of justice create a climate of impunity which curtails the ability of citizens to express their views freely," the International Republican Institute, a US Republican party-funded pro-democracy body, said recently.
Government spokesman Khieu Kanharith rejected the criticism, saying authorities and the National Election Commission were investigating every instance of alleged political intimidation or violence.
Don't forget
the khmer rouge
As the currency, the riel, wobbles against the dollar and businesses temporarily scale back investment, the election campaign is shaping up to be dirtier than, if not as bloody as, previous years.
In the midst of it all, there is little space for serious debate about policies or building a better society.
"Cambodians continue to have very limited notions about what a democracy offers them and how it should function," a study by the US-funded Asia Foundation concluded. "Voters still view their vote primarily as currency for political patronage."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under