PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has criticized the epidemic prevention measures implemented by President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) government as inappropriate. He says that rather than going on like this, "it would be better to just hand over power sooner rather than later. We would be happy to take over and help the public solve their problems."
These are powerful words. They carry the compassion of the bodhisattva Ksitigarbha, who promised to save all sentient beings, and the lofty sentiment of Hsiangyu the Conqueror, who proudly said he would "take anything that could be taken." It is like saying that "the people's wishes are always in my heart" and promising to bring the people of Taiwan out of Egypt, like a modern Moses.
If a leader can come forward and settle the chaos, I am certain that a majority of the Taiwanese people, now suffering from the physical threat and mental panic brought by the SARS virus, is willing to follow him, her, it or Him. We will all follow a mighty leader, be it Soong, Wu Yi (
The question is if any one of all these bad apples, sages and heroes have the intelligence and abilities required to take on the responsibility of telling the public in simple, straightforward language that "I can lead you out of this misery, and this is how I'll do it." Over the last month, we've seen far too many people brave enough to say the first part of this sentence, or the second part, but very few people dare connect the two. Why? Because very few people dare utter such irresponsible words.
The PFP's medical authority, Chang Chao-hsiung (
We shouldn't comment on Chang's and Ma's differences of opinion based on political motives, since both of them probably have their professional reasons. But unless someone is able to resolve this difference, no politician will be qualified to say that he would be "happy to take over sooner rather than later and help the public solve their problems."
In a praiseworthy effort, Chang has introduced an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) reagent from China to his old hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, for use in SARS screening tests. Chang then held a news conference together with the superintendent of the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital to explain how the hospital adopted high-quality measures in its battle against SARS.
Just a few days later, however, that quality image was ruined by reports about an outbreak of SARS within the hospital.
Would it be right to say that Chang has been covering up the shortcomings of his old hospital? Maybe an even more important lesson is that there are limitations to our abilities and knowledge and that no one is omniscient and omnipotent.
People are neither omniscient nor omnipotent. Because we will make mistakes, social regulation and criticism is necessary. Those providing this regulation and criticism should also reflect on the fact that they are neither omniscient nor omnipotent.
Soong said there is a public consensus behind Taiwan's participation in the World Health Organization (WHO), and that "it's just like all of us having to eat. Do we need a referendum on that?" This makes sense.
When Academica Sinica member Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) took over as director-general of the Department of Health, the public looked forward to him applying his respected professionalism toward quickly containing the SARS epidemic. The government, however, sent him to Geneva to play the martyr at an already doomed meeting.
Such a move could of course be both discussed and criticized. But if a political leader said that the public consensus behind Taiwan's participation in the WHO is "just like all of us having to eat," without telling those starving where the food is and how to eat it, wouldn't that just be so much hot air?
After the 921 earthquake, Soong said with regret that rescue and reconstruction efforts would have been much better if the provinicial government hadn't been scrapped. "If" is not the first word people struck by a disastrous earthquake or an epidemic need to hear.
All you ambitious, responsible and able political leaders, please tell a suffering people how you will lead us out of our misery. Show us the way, and you will have our support and be welcome to take over this very instant.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry