Taiwan's request to join the World Health Organization (WHO) as an observer was once again rejected. The reason, of course, was China's thuggish obstruction. Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (
Relations across the Taiwan Strait will once again return to the confrontational cycle of international zero-sum games. China will pay a price for this, helping Taiwan to gain even more international sympathy on the WHO participation issue, and at the same time creating even more revulsion among the Taiwanese public toward China's suppression.
During the 16th National Congress last November, then president Jiang Zemin (
In fact, before the congress, then premier Zhu Rongji (
According to this new definition, China would no longer emphasize that Taiwan is part of China, much less one of its provinces. Rather, relations between Taiwan and the mainland would be equal under "one China." At the congress, the party formally incorporated this new definition into its documents in an effort to express China's sincerity.
In addition, in his report Jiang said that under the "one China" premise, the two sides should "discuss the international space in which the Taiwan region may conduct economic, cultural and social activities compatible with its status." As for the issue of Taiwan joining international organizations as a sovereign entity, interviews that I conducted in China at the time suggested that Beijing was not opposed to the two sides discussing the matter and exchanging views under the "one China" principle in order to seek an approach acceptable to both sides.
But this new thinking on Taiwan has died an early death over the WHO issue. As for the definition of "one China," Wu's description has even regressed to the one that was in place before Jiang's "Eight Points" of 1995. As for the issue of Taiwan's participation in international bodies, Wu's stance is a complete rejection of the flexible approach presented by Jiang at the congress.
According to reports, China's Taiwan affairs agencies once suggested that the matter be handled in a more flexible manner, and that Taiwan be allowed to join the WHO under the "one China" principle. But in the end these suggestions were not adopted by the top leadership.
The significance of the early demise of China's new thinking on Taiwan deserves further study. Has the fourth-generation leadership led by President Hu Jintao (
Will they return to a pragmatic approach? Or could it be that the new leadership does not yet have the experience and wisdom to handle the Taiwan issue? Or that the congress report was simply propaganda, aimed at testing cross-strait relations and pressuring the DPP government into making more concessions on the "one China" issue?
Since the congress report came out, there have been strong, persistent suspicions within Taiwan about China's new thinking.
There has been the belief that it was only a trick -- part of China's "united front" international propaganda, and aimed at, in concert with opposition parties here, into pressuring the DPP into accepting "one China." And that Beijing was not sincere about settling the issue of who has the right to represent Taiwan in the international community.
Today, Wu's remarks have precisely attested to Taiwan's suspicions and ruined China's credibility.
In the future, China will find it harder to win this country's trust even if it comes up with new rhetoric. The confrontation between the two sides of the Strait in the international arena will intensify.
Tung Chen-yuan is an assistant research fellow at the Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with