No appeasing China
Taiwan's failure to enter the World Health Organization (WHO) as an observer is not just a result of realism in international politics. It is a reflection of the indifferent minds of politicians from all over the world, who turned a blind eye to the suffering of people in Taiwan in order to appease China -- the country that gave birth to the disease itself.
In this year's World Health Assembly, China's domineering opposition to including Taiwan in the global health network was supported by many countries. These countries thought that by appeasing China's disease concealment and demonstrating their ignorance of the right of Taiwanese people to live healthily, on the one hand, and rejecting Taiwan's request to participate in the enhancement of human health on the other, that SARS would, magically, never pass their national boundaries and threaten the lives of their own citizens.
Inconceivably, those countries believed that the political totem of "one sovereign Chi-nese state" upheld by China could eventually expel the evils that SARS brought upon the Taiwanese and that SARS is only happening in another reality that will never bring them any direct impact on their lives.
It seemed that the late British prime minister Neville Chamberlain's ghost lingered at the WHA through his speech delivered on Sept. 27, 1939: "However much we may sympathize with a small nation confronted by a big and powerful neighbor ? If we have to fight, it must be on larger issues than that."
What happened on Monday was not an unprecedented event in history, however. More than half a century ago, the same theme took place in a different story. In 1936, Adolf Hitler mobilized his troops and claimed victory over the Rhineland under the banner of "reoccupation" -- which differs from "invasion" only in political rhetoric. Though the German army was given strict orders to retreat in case of resistance, the world chose to be silent on German's military engagement.
To quench the tyrants' thirst for blood, Britain and France agreed to concede the Sudetenland within Czechoslovakia to Germany in 1939. Just before the outbreak of war, Western democracies finally realized that appeasement allowed Nazi Germany to become expansionary and unstoppable. However, it was too late.
Globalization entails increasing human contact and interaction. SARS can and will sneak through national boundaries and the international community will have to deal with it sooner or later.
Leaving Taiwan out in the cold is just another concession plan the world seems to enjoy, but it is as dangerous as leaving the Rhineland unguarded in a war against the Nazi blitzkrieg.
Taiwan should not be excluded from the WHO when it is fighting a disease that can threaten the lives of all humans. And Taiwan will keep voicing to the world in the same spirit that British prime minister sir Winston Churchill cried in his speech broadcast Feb. 9, 1941: "Put your confidence in us ? Give us the tools and we will finish the job."
John Wang
TSU legislator
Over the past few years, China has done quite a few shameful things in the UN to bolster its fictional claim to control Taiwan. When a horrible earthquake struck Taiwan in 1999, killing at least 2,000 people, China accepted condolences from the UN for the quake victims even though China itself did not send rescue teams and did not cancel its 50th national day celebrations to mourn the loss of its "Taiwan compatriots."
In the entire history of the UN, China has exercised four Security Council vetoes. Two dealt with resolving conflicts in Guatemala and Macedonia because both Guatemala and Macedonia were willing to have diplomatic relations with Taipei.
And now, China refuses to allow Taiwan to have observer status in the WHO, even though being a sovereign state is not a pre-requisite for such status. China claims that it can provide all of Taiwan's health needs. Yet when epidemics hit Taiwan, Taipei relies on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for assistance.
It is ironic that while China is paranoid of Taiwan becoming a US protectorate, it is performing actions that effectively makes Taiwan a US health protectorate. Let us not forget that besides a formal declaration of independence, China has threatened to invade Taiwan if some big natural disaster strikes it or if it is occupied by foreign forces.
Allen Timothy Chang
Berkeley, California
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and