With the end of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's regime, the scope of his brutalization of the Iraqi people is becoming clear. Mass graves are being unearthed and torture chambers opened. Countless Iraqis now openly recount horrifying stories of the murder and disappearance of loved ones.
In the other Arab states, the political leadership and the media have not dwelled much on these aspects of Saddam's rule. They have good reason for avoiding such close scrutiny. Many of them benefited directly from Saddam's rule. Examining what he did in Iraq means examining their own role in supporting more than three decades of brutality.
The heyday of Saddam's relations with the Arab world came during the Iran-Iraq war during the 1980s. Saddam's attack on Iran allayed the fears of Arab regimes that Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran would export its Islamic revolution. The late Jordanian monarch King Hussein would join Saddam in inspecting the frontlines. The Gulf states, especially Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, offered Saddam massive financial and media support.
Egypt's centers of power, such as its army, businessmen, journalists and ideological parties, played a prominent role in supporting Saddam's war against Iran. Syria was the sole exception to this chorus of Arab approval for Saddam, because its late leader, President Hafez al Assad, had aligned himself with Iran.
Saddam's brutality within Iraq also served his neighbors' purposes. He repressed the Shiites, the traditional opponents of Sunni-dominated regimes in the region. He suppressed the Kurds, reassuring both Turkey and Syria, countries with sizeable -- and restive -- minority populations of their own. Indeed, by stifling any hint of democracy or political opposition in Iraq, Saddam's police state eliminated all risk of possible contagion of neighboring states.
Outside Iraq, Saddam understood the uses of wealth and influence as a means of gaining friends. He put his oil reserves to good use, providing Jordan and Syria -- each a failing economy -- with deeply discounted supplies, assuring their goodwill.
Saddam also focussed his attention on the media in the Arab world, understanding their power in controlling and regimenting an audience. Saddam spent unreservedly, buying off politicians, journalists, writers and artists in Iraq, the Arab world and beyond. Through a large and interlocking network of security and media organizations, Saddam financed scores of newspapers and magazines, lavishing on their hack writers sums of money that were unimaginable to ordinary Arab journalists.
A political-intelligence-media network was constantly at work. Arab writers and artists invited to Saddam-sponsored cultural events would invariably find a pleasant surprise when opening brief cases distributed as presents -- wads of dollars would be stuffed inside. For favored supporters, the rewards could be much greater: mansions, luxurious apartments, the latest cars.
Dozens of Arab intellectuals engaged in this kind of business with Saddam. In the Arab world many of these people are literary celebrities, film idols, and media stars. Recently discovered documents reveal that hundreds of them received money and gifts from Saddam or his henchmen.
At the center of this network were the cultural organizations that Saddam established in Arab and other capitals. Iraqi embassies acted as media centers, along with their despicable role in hunting dissidents of all political stripes. The sole concern of these lavishly-funded front organizations was to sell Saddam abroad and discredit his opponents.
I experienced directly the difficulty of trying to offer an alternative view of Iraq and its cultural life. With a group of colleagues, I established a modest cultural group, with no external support whatsoever. We had a terrible time trying to publish our writings or getting coverage of the society's activities. I remember how much we agonized before we could print our first literary review, Al-Badeel (The Alternative).
In the Arab region, Saddam manipulated people's sentiments by feeding them an ever-changing diet of secular, Islamist and nationalist slogans. He crowned these with his call to liberate Palestine "from the river to the sea," that is, the destruction of Israel, outdoing the Palestinian leaders themselves. Indeed, it was Saddam who added the words "God is great" in his own handwriting to the Iraqi flag.
Saddam also assigned his deputy Izzat Ibrahim to lead a so-called "faith drive." The campaign was designed to serve several purposes, including the suppression of any free, secular thinking. On a wider scale, it was meant to influence and win over Arab and Muslim minds by hollow but bombastic rhetoric. Unfortunately, many Arabs, rulers and ruled alike, fell for it.
With the end of Saddam's regime, Iraq faces a reckoning for decades of physical brutality and cultural intimidation. Iraqis will have to revisit concepts -- like nationalism, sovereignty and Islamic community -- that have never come under critical examination. How the Arab world reacts to Iraq's reckoning, and whether other Arabs will face their own complicity in Saddam's legacy, will tell us a great deal about what sort of Arab societies the future will bring.
Awad Nasir is an Iraqi poet still exiled in London, where he works as a writer and editor.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.