My quarantine at home for SARS is finally over. I never left my home and abided by all the related measures during this period. I therefore believe that I have fulfilled my social responsibility. But there is something that I have to say in light of my personal experience over the past two weeks.
Based on my experience, I realize that SARS prevention cannot solely rely on the public's conscience. Today, the government's health agencies only call on suspected patients through moral exhortation to undergo domestic quarantine voluntarily. But they failed to provide a necessary "SARS quarantine guide" that clearly lists what those under quarantine should and should not do. A disease prevention network merely built on the public's conscience is fragile.
To test your knowledge of SARS quarantine, just ask yourself: Do you know that there are two kinds of quarantinees: those who have recently been to SARS-infected areas and those who have been in frequent contact with SARS patients? Do you know that the quarantine rules for the two are not exactly the same? Should their family members also be quarantined? Do you know how to deal with their clothing, dining utensils and garbage? What should a quarantined person do if he or she does not have a mask or clinical thermometer?
These problems seem to be minor ones. But related health agencies never contacted me or instructed me about the various quarantine rules, as I was trying to protect my family members, neighbors and community. Under such circumstances, I could do nothing but rely on my own efforts -- such as checking the epidemic information online, calling the Department of Health (DOH), and asking advice from my doctor friends.
Unfortunately, quarantinees who live alone without any information from the outside world, may easily become loop-holes in the prevention network due to the lack of information.
Take Taipei City's homeless people, for example. The media have portrayed them as "unstable bombs scattered across the city," or "widespread sources of infection." Even those with sufficient information may not know how to protect themselves. Since the homeless do not watch TV or read newspapers, isn't their lack of SARS-related information the government's responsibility?
For those who purposely violate quarantine rules, the government should certainly punish them heavily. However, can't it provide a complete "SARS quarantine guide" to those who need to be isolated when issuing a quarantine order?.
The DOH has, in fact, announced that it will publish a quarantine guide for those who are under home quarantine. Hopefully, as the old Chinese saying goes, "It's not too late to mend the sheepfold after a sheep is lost."
In the war against SARS, one can imagine the pressure facing our health workers at the grassroots level. But this is exactly the time that we need them the most. Besides, there are still ways to solve the current manpower shortage. My suggestions for the government are:
First, it should appropriately use local community staff. For example, village or borough chiefs and representatives can assist health officials to deliver quarantine orders while teaching every household in their communities about SARS prevention.
Second it should cooperate with religious, social welfare and other civil groups. It can entrust certain quarantine matters to them.
Only when Taiwan allows those who are not under quarantine to also join and monitor the prevention work will its prevention network be perfectly safe.
Wang Jung-chang is secretary-general of Taiwan's League of Welfare Organization for Disabled.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry