The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Taiwan, which we had thought was under control, took a sudden twist when a cluster of SARS cases emerged at Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital on April 23. The health authorities issued an emergency order at 11am the next day to seal off the hospital. People visiting their sick relatives and patients collecting routine medication were all confined to the hospital.
Through the long lenses of television cameras, we saw people fleeing in panic. We saw the helpless faces of people exasperated by the sudden deprivation of their freedom and by the fear of death. All this was reminiscent of terrorist hijacking incidents frequently seen on TV.
The health authorities certainly acted in accordance with professional considerations when adopting such drastic measures. But the containment of a disease requires, primarily, the cooperation of all the people, rather than surprise confinement and quarantine. People need to understand the situation if they are to be made to cooperate.
But when the Hoping Hospital incident occurred, the public saw only the fear of those isolated in the face of an imminent disaster and did not know the real situation. Here is a simple analysis of SARS and its social and psychological implications.
In November last year, it was rumored that a strange disease was spreading around Foshan in China's Guangdong Province and had caused some deaths. It gradually spread to Hong Kong, Hanoi, Singapore, Bangkok, Toronto and Taipei after February. In early March, the epidemic started to attract attention from the World Health Organization (WHO) and disease-prevention authorities across the globe. Initially termed an atypical pneumonia, this strange disease ultimately came to be called severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS.
Many strains of germs, moulds and even parasites and chemicals can cause pneumonia. Before antibiotics were invented, pneumonia had a high death toll. Indeed, it was the No. 1 killer of humans.
Because pneumonia can be caused by many things and often leads to combination infections, the pathogens in around 40 percent of pneumonia cases cannot be identified. But thanks to antibiotics, most germ-induced pneumonia can be cured, even though its etiologic agents are not recognized. Pneumonia is no longer a major worry to most people.
But the situation remains unchanged for virus-induced pneumonia. There is no effective cure, and patients can only count on sustained therapy to activate their own immune system's response. The SARS outbreak is the result of a virus. But experts still differ over which virus or viruses are responsible.
In addition to the commonly seen viral infection and pneumonia, SARS-affected patients might also suffer breathing difficulties when the situation becomes serious. Ten percent of them need to use auxiliary devices for breathing. If there is no appropriate equipment and care, 4 percent of the patients are at risk of death.
Just when we believed that communicable diseases had been contained or had disappeared, a new epidemic -- which is caused by unknown etiological agents, spread by unknown modes of transmission, can kill, and for which no specific therapy is available -- suddenly strikes human beings. It is no surprise that health experts are worried.
In addition, due to great volumes of international travel and easy access to information, Asia, North America, Europe, Africa, South America and Australia have all reported SARS cases.The disease has quickly surpassed AIDS as the modern-day plague.
From November last year to April 24, SARS cases totaled 4,288 worldwide, with a death toll of 221. Such an epidemic appears relatively benign when compared with the situation between 1918 and 1919 when flu claimed 20 million lives in 15 months.
But the WHO's great concern, coupled with extensive media coverage, has seriously damaged Hong Kong's economy. Such a strong reaction is related to Europeans' memory of the flu. Even now, they still describe all the fearful flus as Asian.
The flu is not that frightening for us, perhaps because we have developed immunity after long exposure to it. It is not difficult to understand the Western world's vehement reactions to the SARS outbreak that originated in Guangdong, however. But how should our health experts view it: from our point of view or from that of Westerners?
When SARS is viewed as a plague, its patients are stigma-tized. This will cause social instability and, moreover, encourage patients to cover up their ill-nesses. It militates against disease-containing efforts. Adopting drastic measures might safeguard the country's international image and economic interests, but it might also violate human rights and invite protest. Health experts must therefore exercise extreme caution and make wise judgements, promoting professionalism and preventing collective panic.
Liu Chung-tung is a professor of medical sociology at National Defense Medical Center.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry