Religion not a problem
I object to portions of the opinion piece on the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) on China ("SARS can modernize China in long term," April 28, page 8).
I do not wish to debate the main topic -- the parts I would like to object against is: "In recent years, China has proven its ability to deal with, or at least suppress, problems related to Falun Gong, AIDS and the protests of laid-off workers. Why should SARS be an exception?" and later "The SARS problem is different from those of Falun Gong, AIDS and laid-off worker protests."
I strongly protest to putting Falun Gong in the same list of `problems' as AIDS and SARS. Perhaps it was not the author's intention to put down the good name of Falun Gong, however, it was certainly very misleading and creates negative impression about Falun Gong for a person new to the subject.
Falun Gong is the practice that advocates high moral standards and has been honored by the governments and the people of the numerous countries, including Taiwan, for its contribution to the stability and morality of society.
There are no problems related to Falun Gong that have ever been mentioned by the government of any country except China. China's human rights record is notoriously poor and it is not only Falun Gong practitioners who suffer greatly from state-sponsored medieval persecution.
I implore you, do not intentionally or unintentionally assist the Chinese government in spreading lies about the "phantom menace" of Falun Gong. The only thing Falun Gong practitioners do, which is regarded by the Chinese government as a "problem" is to tell the truth about the practice and the inhuman persecution that takes place in China. This is a basic human right of any person -- to defend one's good name and then object to being treated cruelly and unjustly.
Ioulia Valouiskaia
Laurencekirk, Scotland
A different perspective
I am simply in shock after reading Chien Hsi-chieh's (簡錫土皆) article ("Setting a new policy for Taiwan," April 29, page 8). Not only am I shocked, but also worried about the future of Taiwan and its people, should they share his views.
Allow me to offer a different perspective based on what Chien.
Chien wrote: "We shed tears over a disaster that human civilization cannot undo." I watched television and saw only tears of joy flowing from the Iraqis dancing in the streets of Baghdad, realizing their new-found liberation. Baghdad did not fall to pieces. In fact, Operation Iraqi Freedom will go down in history as the war with the least collateral damage.
High-tech weapons were fine-tuned to strike targets with more precision than ever before. Most of Iraq remains unshaken and intact.
Chien also opposes "further wars of invasion by the US against other nations."
It seems Chien failed to realize that the serious consequence of war was authorized in various UN Security Council resolutions and finally in Resolution 1441. The US and Britain were just holding the council to its words clearly stated in the papers.
Chien's idea of the "legal rights of a nation" is quite scary. Should the UN and the International Criminal Court (ICC) determine a nation's legal rights? If that is the belief, then the people of Taiwan should abandon all hope, because we have absolutely no rights internationally. China, a vocal and prominent member of the UN, and its allies have denied all our rights already.
It is important to remember that the UN is not a government of nations. That would clearly violate all national sovereignty. The people of Taiwan can still stand tall and proud and enjoy the rights of a global citizen in the international community even though the UN does not welcome us for political reasons.
Chien is fond of the ICC and wants it to investigate "whether US President George W. Bush's war on Iraq constitutes what the ICC specifies as war crimes." Chronologically, the ICC ought to find out whether former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein is a war criminal first.
Why wasn't there a push for the ICC when Hussein's atrocities were well documented? This seems like a case of anti-American hypocrisy.
I respect anti-war and pro-peace opinions. Nobody likes war, but sometimes it is inevitable due to evil and oppression. Sometimes anti-war sentiments turn into something dangerously twisted, too.
Eugene Liu
Atlanta, Georgia
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.