Cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) were first discovered last November in Guangzhou -- the capital city of Guangdong Province. However, typical Chinese-style political operations have allowed the epidemic to spread virtually unchecked.
Meanwhile, people have witnessed many characteristics of China's politics, such as the government's isolationism and its traditional thinking about the majority and minorities, not to mention the media's eager attempts to cover up the SARS problem for the sake of China's image.
The first characteristic of Chinese politics is perhaps the closed value system. As the deadly epidemic expanded, the local media in Guangdong ran a series of reports in February. A newspaper even published an interview with a medical expert, urging China to cooperate with the World Health Organization (WHO) to battle against the fatal contagion.
But the newspaper was warned by the government when China's annual "two conferences" took place last month. Beijing's resistance to the West for the sake of its image is self-evident. In fact, this an important characteristic of China.
Although Beijing has vowed to get on track with the world, it still insists on its anti-colonialism and anti-imperialism on human rights, religion and certain issues.
The second characteristic of Chinese politics is the government's traditional thinking about the majority and minorities. The statements of Long Yongtu (
"We should panic if half a million of the almost 7 million people in Hong Kong were infected with SARS," he added. "But we shouldn't make a fuss over this trifling matter since only a few hundred people are infected with the disease."
Chinese officials often selectively believe that whatever is advantageous to them is in the interest of "the majority" and whatever is disadvantageous to them belongs to "minorities."
Due to this selective thinking, Chinese officials are usually unaware of (or unwilling to know) the truth.
The third characteristic of Chinese politics is glossing over a problem with official statements and media while the crisis starts to expand. Due to the growing epidemic, Beijing had no choice but to allow medical experts from the WHO to inspect the situation in China. During the Ministry of Health's first press conference on China's SARS problem, then minister of health Zhang Wenkang (
"After the WHO experts arrived in Beijing, they witnessed the safe and harmonious atmosphere, as well as the effective efforts of our medical experts," Zhang said. His words were widely reported by the media.
However, the next day, Li Liming (李立明) -- director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention -- and some health authorities also held a press conference on the matter.
He apologized to the public for the poor cooperation between the government health agencies and the media, which led to the media's insufficient coverage of the contagion, affecting the public's awareness of the disease and their ability protect themselves. Li's apology attracted only the international media's attention, while China's public media and Web sites completely ignored it.
Although the epidemic and the public's fear have constantly risen, the Chinese media have started using their two-faced tactic. On the one hand, they follow the government's official statements. On the other hand, the media overreported the recovery cases in Beijing.
For example, the Xinhua News Agency commented in an editorial that "unity, respect and friendliness will lead to victory." It claimed that Chinese health experts' handling of the outbreak has been highly praised by the WHO experts, and that China's handling of the situation has won the international community's understanding and trust.
Such characteristics of Chinese politics have caused unspeakable fear among the public, because their lives seem to be insignificant when they are living without knowing the truth. They have also caused substantial damage to China's neighbors, especially Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam.
The Washington Post said recently that the SARS outbreak is a harsh test of Beijing's new leadership.
For Taiwan, shouldn't this serve as a vote of non-confidence in China?
Taiwan desired the WHO's assistance when the disease was first reported here. But it was disappointed by political factors. In contrast, the WHO wished to assist China but was repeatedly refused.
Hasn't China's handling of SARS highlighted once again the fundamental difference between Taiwan and China?
Hsu Tung-ming is a freelance writer based in Beijing.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry