Cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) were first discovered last November in Guangzhou -- the capital city of Guangdong Province. However, typical Chinese-style political operations have allowed the epidemic to spread virtually unchecked.
Meanwhile, people have witnessed many characteristics of China's politics, such as the government's isolationism and its traditional thinking about the majority and minorities, not to mention the media's eager attempts to cover up the SARS problem for the sake of China's image.
The first characteristic of Chinese politics is perhaps the closed value system. As the deadly epidemic expanded, the local media in Guangdong ran a series of reports in February. A newspaper even published an interview with a medical expert, urging China to cooperate with the World Health Organization (WHO) to battle against the fatal contagion.
But the newspaper was warned by the government when China's annual "two conferences" took place last month. Beijing's resistance to the West for the sake of its image is self-evident. In fact, this an important characteristic of China.
Although Beijing has vowed to get on track with the world, it still insists on its anti-colonialism and anti-imperialism on human rights, religion and certain issues.
The second characteristic of Chinese politics is the government's traditional thinking about the majority and minorities. The statements of Long Yongtu (
"We should panic if half a million of the almost 7 million people in Hong Kong were infected with SARS," he added. "But we shouldn't make a fuss over this trifling matter since only a few hundred people are infected with the disease."
Chinese officials often selectively believe that whatever is advantageous to them is in the interest of "the majority" and whatever is disadvantageous to them belongs to "minorities."
Due to this selective thinking, Chinese officials are usually unaware of (or unwilling to know) the truth.
The third characteristic of Chinese politics is glossing over a problem with official statements and media while the crisis starts to expand. Due to the growing epidemic, Beijing had no choice but to allow medical experts from the WHO to inspect the situation in China. During the Ministry of Health's first press conference on China's SARS problem, then minister of health Zhang Wenkang (
"After the WHO experts arrived in Beijing, they witnessed the safe and harmonious atmosphere, as well as the effective efforts of our medical experts," Zhang said. His words were widely reported by the media.
However, the next day, Li Liming (李立明) -- director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention -- and some health authorities also held a press conference on the matter.
He apologized to the public for the poor cooperation between the government health agencies and the media, which led to the media's insufficient coverage of the contagion, affecting the public's awareness of the disease and their ability protect themselves. Li's apology attracted only the international media's attention, while China's public media and Web sites completely ignored it.
Although the epidemic and the public's fear have constantly risen, the Chinese media have started using their two-faced tactic. On the one hand, they follow the government's official statements. On the other hand, the media overreported the recovery cases in Beijing.
For example, the Xinhua News Agency commented in an editorial that "unity, respect and friendliness will lead to victory." It claimed that Chinese health experts' handling of the outbreak has been highly praised by the WHO experts, and that China's handling of the situation has won the international community's understanding and trust.
Such characteristics of Chinese politics have caused unspeakable fear among the public, because their lives seem to be insignificant when they are living without knowing the truth. They have also caused substantial damage to China's neighbors, especially Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam.
The Washington Post said recently that the SARS outbreak is a harsh test of Beijing's new leadership.
For Taiwan, shouldn't this serve as a vote of non-confidence in China?
Taiwan desired the WHO's assistance when the disease was first reported here. But it was disappointed by political factors. In contrast, the WHO wished to assist China but was repeatedly refused.
Hasn't China's handling of SARS highlighted once again the fundamental difference between Taiwan and China?
Hsu Tung-ming is a freelance writer based in Beijing.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China